Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 06 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. The appellant is the husband of the deceased, who was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’). The marriage between the appellant and the deceased was ten years old, when on 31.07.1994, the deceased […]

[Civil Appeal No. 1598 of 2023] Vikram Nath,J. 1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 23.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No.191 of 2013 between Shakeel Ahmed and Syed Akhlaq Hussain, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree of the Trial Court decreeing

[Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 8674 of 2020] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. The present petitions have been filed by two nephews of one Mohideen Abdul Khadar, who died on 14.06.2019. He had interest in two blocks of lands, adjacent to each other

[Criminal Appeal No. 2697 of 2023] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. The appellant Anil Kumar has been convicted under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code1 by both the courts below and has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/, and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year under

[Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred by the accused challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by which the order of their acquittal, passed by the Sessions Court, was overturned. The appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Part I

[Civil Appeal No. 9720 of 2014] Nagarathna, J. 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the judgment dated 06.07.2012, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, in Writ Appeal No. 2458 of 2010 whereby the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.05.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 12239 of 2008, remanding the

[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 15774/2022] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The main point which we have to address in this appeal is as to what extent the Court can take cognizance of a clause relating to purpose for which a lease is granted contained in an unregistered deed

[Criminal Appeal No. 1136 of 2014] Satnam Singh Vs. The Narcotics Control Bureau [Criminal Appeal No. 1933 of 2014] Hima Kohli, J. 1. The present appeals arise from the common judgment dated 08th July, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh deciding the Murder Reference1 prepared

[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19401 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19730 of 2019] B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present set of appeals challenge the common judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay

[Civil Appeal No. 6072 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 9964 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 6073 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 12637 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 6074 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 16749 of 2023] J. K. Maheshwari, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In the