Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 2835 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 20169/2013] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave arises out of the order dated 20.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No.1312 of 2012 which was dismissed in limine by the High Court, […]

[Civil Appeal No. 8190 of 2003] R. F. NARIMAN, J. Vide a show cause notice dated 30.08.2001 that was served upon the appellant M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (then known as M/s Maruti Udyog Limited), the Department gathered, by way of intelligence, that the appellant had cleared inputs/ spares after processing, but duty was only

[Civil Appeal No.2819 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.4148 of 2011] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment and order dated 01.12.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Letters Patent Appeal No.268 of 2010 (for short “LPA”) in Writ Petition

[Civil Appeal No(S). 2818 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No (S). 32226 of 2009] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the common judgment dated 26.08.2009, passed in W.A.No.5377 of 2004 and W.P.No.23782 of 2005. 3. The writ appeal was preferred by the first respondent herein against the

[Civil Appeal No(S). 2814-2815 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.33342-43 of 2014] Yashdeep Trexim Private Ltd. Vs. Baranagore Jute Factory Plc. (In Liquidation) and Others. [Civil Appeal No(S).2816 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24871 of 2014] Judgment M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals by

[Criminal Appeal No. 2224 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. This criminal appeal arises from final order and judgment dated 13 December 2010 of the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 296 of 2010 whereby the High Court has upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused-appellant. The accused-appellant was convicted

[Criminal Appeal No. 707 of 2007] Periyanagayasamy and Ors. Vs. Inspector of Police, Aandimadam Police Station [Criminal Appeal No. 774 of 2007] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. These appeals have been filed by accused persons against the judgment and order dated 16.3.2006 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.1540 of 2002 by

[Civil Appeal No. 2759 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.12858 2009] [C.A. No. 2760 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No. 16499/2013] [C.A. No. 2761 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No. 17050/2013] [C.A. Nos. 2762-2764 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No. 17639-17641/2013] [C.A. No. 2765 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No. 18161/2013] [C.A. No.

[Civil Appeal No. 7400 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.7338 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.7375-7376 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.7399 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.9388 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.9389 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.96 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30

[Civil Appeal Nos.5946-5947 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.6455-6456 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.8602-8603 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J 1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against a common judgment and order dated 26th June, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench in Writ Petition (MD) No.11350 of