Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No. 2194 of 2011] Rakesh Anand and ANR. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR. [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2195-2196 of 2011] Shiv Kesh Giri @ Lalla Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 2198 of 2011] Devesh Agnihotri Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 2199/2011] Rajesh Verma Vs. State of […]

[Writ Petition (C) No.367 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. At the time of hearing of this petition, it has been submitted that Petitioner No.1 has already filed an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai (DRAT) and the said appeal, being AIR (SA) 230/2011, is pending. In the afore-stated appeal an

[Writ Petition (C) No. 37 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two appeals which have been filed by the petitioner, being CCI/568/1988 and CCI/569/1988, are pending before the First Cooperative Court at Mumbai. 2. We direct the said Court to dispose of

[Civil Appeal Nos. 2874-75 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.18732-18733 of 2012] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the dispute with regard to the amount payable by the appellants is pending before the Joint Registrar of the Cooperative Societies

[Civil Appeal No. 2822 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.21260 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel, we have learnt that the appellant has already filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Ahmedabad (DRT), being Securitisation Appeal No.38 of 2001, which is pending.

[Criminal Appeal No.65 of 2012] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This criminal appeal is filed by the accused against the final order/judgment dated 15.03.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.2109-SB of 2009 which arises out of judgment/order dated 18.08.2009/20.08.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat

[Civil Appeal No. 5099 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No. 5126 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. These Appeals were originally filed seeking relief on the basis of provisions in the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequently, upon the enactment of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, the

[Criminal Appeal No.787 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No.788 of 2011] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. These two Appeals before us assail the common Judgment dated 8.9.2010 of the Madras High Court which only partly allowed the Appeals before it, in favour of the Accused-Appellants. The Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 787/ 2011 is the First Accused;

[Criminal Appeal No. 1311 of 2006] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. This Appeal by Special Leave is directed against the Judgment of the High Court of Madras dated 5.10.2005 whereby the conviction of the Accused/ Appellant Nagaraj under Section 302 IPC came to be affirmed. The Accused was sentenced to Life Imprisonment and was further directed

[Criminal Appeal No(S). 230 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Though, this Court vide order dated 18.09.2012 appointed Mr. Parmanand Katara as Amicus Curiae, he has not appeared. This is an unfortunate situation and we do not appreciate the same. However, on our request, Mr. Mohan Pandey, learned counsel who was present in the Court