Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.5054 of 2008] [Civil Appeal Nos.5100,5283,5105-5124,5101-5104,5053,5050,5052 all of 2008, 3279,3280, all of 2012, ,5127-5129,5125,,5051 all of 2008 and 3278 of 2012] O R D E R VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. All of these Appeals were admitted before the commencement of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement […]

[Civil Appeal No.2548 of 2009] Jagdish Prasad Vs. Iqbal Kaur & Ors. [Slp (C) No.25828 of 2013] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. This matter has been placed before the Bench of three Judges in pursuance of an order dated April 15, 2009 passed by the bench of two Hon’ble Judges to consider the correctness of

[Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2010] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This criminal appeal, by special leave, is directed against the impugned common judgment dated June 17, 2009 of the High Court of Gujarat whereby the High Court dismissed Criminal Appeal No.1327 of 2004 filed by the appellants and confirmed the order passed by the

[Criminal Appeal No. 1410 of 2013] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated 12.3.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, in Criminal Appeal No.1275 of 1997 whereby the High Court has upheld the sentence awarded to the appellant by the

[Civil Appeal No.2463 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 3686 of 2007] [Civil Appeal Nos. 2287-2288 of 2010] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5035-5037 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 10813 of 2013] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 3686 of 2007. Having regard to the commonality of controversy in this batch of

[Criminal Appeal No.1330 of 2009] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th November, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, in Criminal Appeal No.455 of 2003, upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentence of rigorous

[Criminal Appeal No.1848 of 2008] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17th November, 2007 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.158 of 2007 upholding the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence

[Civil Appeal Nos.2466-2467 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.25568-25569 of 2014] R.F.Nariman, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals raise an interesting question as to the interpretation of a proviso contained in Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (in short the “1995

[Civil Appeal No. 7065 of 2008] Dipak Misra, J. In this appeal, by special leave, the assail is to the judgment and order dated 10th March, 2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala in M.F.A. No. 55 of 2006 wherein the High Court has accepted the report of the Scrutiny

[Criminal Appeal No.1375 of 2010] Mukesh @ Billu Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No.1328 of 2013] O R D E R 1. These appeals have been filed by the accused persons who were convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, under Section 120-B of the Indian