Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal Nos. 84-85 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 91-92 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 89-90 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2016] [Civil Appeal Nos. 87-88 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2016] 1. This batch of appeals arises from a judgment dated 21 July 2010 by a Division Bench of the […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5542 – 5543 of 2023] J. B. Pardiwala, J.: For the convenience of the exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: 1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also the same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order

[Civil Appeal No. 1968 of 2012] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. This appeal by way of special leave by Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited1 takes exception to the judgment dated 02.11.2007, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the appeal2 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited3 under Section 37 of the

[Criminal Appeal No. 688 of 2011] Ravinder Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2011] Shri Krishan Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 785 of 2011] Manoj Misra, J. 1. These three appeals are against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi (in short “the

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 793-794 of 2022] [Criminal Appeal No. 795 of 2022] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Ajit Pal @ Bobby, a 15-year-old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July, 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, and son, Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav, stood trial in Sessions Case

[Civil Appeal No. 6070 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 20183 of 2022] Sanjay Karol J., 1. Leave granted. 2. The following questions arise for consideration of this Court: 2.1 Whether in the absence of affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties on addressing the framed substantial questions of law, the High

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No(S). 520 of 2022] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner, currently serving a life imprisonment sentence for a crime committed in 1996, punishable under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter “IPC”) approaches this court seeking to enforce his right under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

[Criminal Appeal No. 2151 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (for short, ‘FEMA’) was brought into force with effect from 1st June 2000. By virtue of subsection (1) of Section 49 of FEMA, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (for short, ‘FERA’) stood repealed. On 11th February

[Civil Appeal No. 10861 of 2013] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. We had heard Shri Rakesh Dahiya learned counsel for the appellant, as well as Shri Raju Ramachandran, learned senior counsel for the respondents. Ms. (Dr.) Monika Gusain had appeared for the State of Haryana and was also heard. 2. The common judgment and order dated 18.05.2010 passed

[Criminal Appeal No. 2173 of 2011] Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. The original appellant P. Sarangapani son of Laxmaiah (accused no.1) having expired pending the present Appeal, his wife Paka Saroja was permitted to proceed further with the Appeal as per the order passed by the court on 31st August, 2023. 2. The instant Appeal is directed