Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No.2323 of 2014] O R D E R ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 25th March, 2011 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.1298 of 2005. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 19th September, 2004 […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 222 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.881 of 2014] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 29th August, 2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi whereby the High Court has dismissed T.P. (Crl.) No.31 of 2013

[Writ Petition (C) No.61 of 2011] Heard the learned counsel. The only prayer made in this petition is that initiation of proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (‘SARFAESI Act’), more particularly by a notice dated 2nd June, 2004, issued under Section 13(2) of the Act

[Civil Appeal No.1416 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 12513 of 2013] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. The appellant in this appeal has challenged the judgment and order dated 29.08.2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, passed in Writ Petition No. 3652 of 2012, whereby the High Court allowed the writ

[Writ Petition (C) No.252 of 2004] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This petition has been filed as public interest litigation on the issue of protection of historical objects preserved at different places in the country particularly in various museums. Prayer in the petition is for a direction for adequate security arrangements and for proper investigation

[Civil Appeal No.1415 of 2015 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.4969/2014] R. BANUMATI, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. Being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the High Court of Gujarat in First Appeal No. 4021 of 1998 dated 16.1.2012, the claimants have filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation on account

[Civil Appeal No. 1733 of 2015 Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7445 of 2012] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel. 3. The short question with which we are concerned in this case is whether the appellants, who are legal heirs of the original allottee of a shop,

[Civil Appeal No. 1389 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No.33509/2011] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This civil appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2011 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in L.P.A. No. 447 of 2009 which arises out

[Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.8715/2014] [Criminal Appeal Nos.166-167 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.10109-10110/2014] [Criminal Appeal Nos.164-165 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.9524-9525/2014] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals are filed by the accused persons against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2014 passed

[Civil Appeal No. 3137 of 2010] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. The Appellant has by the pulpit of this Civil Appeal assailed the Judgment and final Order dated 13.3.2007 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh (Hyderabad) in CMA No. 1986 of 2003, rendered in the matter of Syed Abdul Saleem v. The