Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.9389 of 2014] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J 1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against orders dated 19th November, 2013 and 5th March, 2014 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench at New Delhi in O.A. No.401 of 2013 and R.A No.11 of 2014 with M.A No.120 of 2014 in O.A. No.401 […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 142 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 1156/2013] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.10.2012 passed by Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No.5043 of 2011 in which the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 read

[Civil Appeal Nos. 712-713 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.3106-3107 of 2012] S.C. Awasthi & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 714-715 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.20425-20426 of 2011] P.N. Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 716 of 2014 arising out of

[Civil Appeal No. 176 of 2015] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 27.9.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in R.S.A. No.297/2007, wherein the High Court allowed the appeal in part, modifying the concurrent judgment and decree passed by the courts below and holding that the appellants- plaintiffs

[Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.6449 of 2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by Special Leave arises out of the judgment dated 24.04.2014 passed by the Karnataka High Court in Criminal Petition No.252 of 2014, in and by which, the High Court, while dismissing the

[Arbitration Case (Civil) No.35 of 2014] Judgment 1. A works contract No.3AAA dated 20th December, 2000 was executed by and between the petitioner and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (respondent No.1 herein) for execution of city tunnel rehabilitation works for the purposes of transporting the city’s sewage. Disputes and differences having arisen between the

[Criminal Appeal No.552 of 2012] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This appeal is filed by accused No.1 against the final judgment and order dated 30.11.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai in Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 1991 which arose from the judgment and order dated 26.02.1991 passed by the 5th Additional

[Civil Appeal No. 9755 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9756 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9758 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9759 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9760 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9761 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9762 of 2011] Heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties. It is not in

[Civil Appeal No. 8577 of 2014] KURIAN, J.: Appellant is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the High Court declining to condone the delay of 1373 days in filing the appeal against the judgment dated 14.11.2000 in A.S. No. 108 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Bhavani, Erode District, Tamil Nadu.

[Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL) No.1491 of 2012] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2011 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur in Criminal Revision No.6 of 2009 by the complainant against