Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.5983 of 2007] Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal, by special leave, the justifiability and soundness of the judgment and order dated 18.5.2006 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in W.P.(Service) No. 6106 of 2005 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court has overturned the order passed by […]

[Civil Appeal No. 7133 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. The Respondent herein, No. 7773409X Havildar (Military Police) Purushottam, was enrolled in the Corps of Military Police, on 7th June 1983. On 27th November 2001, while the Respondent was posted to 916 Provost Unit (General Reserve Engineer Force, or GREF), he was detailed as a

[Civil Appeal No. 20 of 2015 arising out of SLP (C) No. 921 of 2014] VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Appellant before us was the Defendant in a suit filed by the Respondent-Plaintiff praying for a decree of mandatory injunction directing the Appellant to hand over vacant possession of the property in

[Civil Appeal No. 3655 of 2010] PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 27.8.2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in Special Appeal No. 1167 of 1999, whereby said Court has partly allowed the appeal, and substituted the punishment of removal awarded to the appellant, by

[Criminal Appeal No(S). 534-535 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: The appellants faced trial under Section 498A read with Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’). The trial court acquitted them under Section 304B of IPC but convicted them under Section 498A of IPC. The

[Civil Appeal No. 11604 /2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 15314 of 2014] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Once a judicial authority takes a decision under Section 8(1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) declining to refer the dispute pending before it to arbitration and the said decision

[Civil Appeal No. 11525 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(c) No. 10968 of 2010] Abhay Manohar Sapre,J. 1. Leave granted 2. This civil appeal is filed by the State of U.P. against the judgment dated 31.07.2009 passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No. 854 of 2009

[Civil Appeal Nos.11690-11712 of 2014 arising out of SLP [C] Nos.20539-20561/2011] [CA No.11719/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17316/2011] [CA No.11714-16/2014 @ SLP [C] Nos.17119-17121/2011] [CA No.11725/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17342/2011] [CA No.11722/2014 @ SLP [C] No.17339/2011] [CA No.11728/2014 @ SLP [C] No.19083/2011] [CA No.11730/2014 @ SLP [C] No.19084/2011] [CA No.11753/2014 @ SLP [C] No.20569/2011] [CA No.11771/2014

[Civil Appeal No. 11527 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.11684 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 11528 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No 35892 CC No. 14663 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 11530 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.35914 .CC No. 20144 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 11531 of 2014

[Special Leave Petition (C) No.27519 of 2014] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The petitioner before this Court, took on rent the shop in question, from the respondent-landlord, in the year 1979. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that after taking the shop on rent, the basic rental was enhanced from