Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal Nos. 1538-1539 of 2008] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 358 of 2011] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI 1. The appeals1 arise from a judgment and order dated 15 October 2003 of a Division Bench at the Jaipur Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan. In addition, there is a writ petition2 under […]

[Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018] [SLP(C) No. 10918/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9604/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9613/2018] [Diary No(s). 24834/2018] [Diary No(s). 25256/2018] [SLP(C) No. 24671/2018] [Diary No(s). 32753/2018] [Diary No(s). 32756/2018] [Diary No(s). 37055/2018] [Diary No(s). 39059/2018] [SLP(C) No. 426/2019] [SLP(C) No. 505-506/2019] [SLP(C) No. 17506/2018] [Diary No(s). 23638/2018] [Diary No(s). 24137/2018] [Diary No(s). 24530/2018] [Diary

[Criminal Appeal No. 1255 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1367 of 1999] [Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 47 of 2011] [Writ Petition (C) No. 316 of 2008] [TC (C) No. 27 of 2011] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 316 of 2008] 1. This batch of cases raises two significant issues: (i)

[Criminal Appeal No. 1012 of 2022] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The occurrence based on which the appellant was convicted was of 7th November 2003. According to the prosecution case, around 10 a.m. on that day, about 1,000 to 1,500 people had gathered in the Shah Alam area of the city of Ahmedabad. When

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2069-2070 of 2022] Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. 1. These appeals would call in question the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2022 and 05.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No. 08 of 2020 whereby the High Court has

[Civil Appeal No._________ of 2023 arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No._________ @ Diary No. 29700 of 2019] Aniruddha Bose, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The main question which arises for adjudication in this appeal is as to whether the Registrar of Society, empowered to grant registration under West Bengal Registration

[Civil Appeal Nos.5529-5530 of 2023] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The appellants were employed initially as Physical Instructors in Government Grade Colleges in Karnataka. The first appellant reached the selection grade pay scale of the University Grants Commission (UGC) on 1st January 1986. The second appellant was granted senior scale of pay on 1st

[Civil Appeal No. 5510 of 2023] Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. The appellants by way of present appeal have challenged the legality and validity of the impugned judgment and order dated 27.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Misc. Civil Application (for recall) No. 3 of 2019 in Regular Second Appeal

[Civil Appeal No. 2085 of 2022] Vikram Nath, J. 1. This appeal, under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,1 has been filed assailing the correctness of judgment and order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2 dated 04.01.2022, whereby the Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.930 of 2021 filed by the appellant was dismissed

[Civil Appeal No. 8238 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. This appeal, by way of special leave, takes exception to the judgment of the division bench of the High Court of Calcutta, whereby the intra-court appeal preferred by the State of West Bengal and Others in F.M.A. No. 1458 of 2017 with CAN No. 6596