Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal Nos. 10086-10087 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.35736-35737 of 2013] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and final Order dated 3.5.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No.348 of 2012 with Civil Application No.666 […]

[Criminal Appeal Nos. of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) Nos. 2479-2487 of 2009] Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against judgment and order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh, in Contempt Appeal Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11

[Civil Appeal No. 10024 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 24317 of 2013] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted 2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 21.05.2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ)

[Civil Appeal No. 9996 of 2014 arising Out Of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 480 of 2012] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal depicts and, in a way, sculpts the non- acceptance of conceptual limitation in every human sphere including that of adjudication. No adjudicator or a Judge can conceive the idea that the sky is

[Civil Appeal No. 9999 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.17291 of 2014] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Looking at the facts of the case, the learned counsel had agreed for final hearing of the appeal and therefore, the appeal was taken up for hearing. 3. In this appeal, the judgment

[Civil Appeal No. 9972 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2339 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-claimants against the Judgment and order dated 31.07.2013 passed in First Appeal No. 413 of 2007 by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla,

[Criminal Appeal No.1167 of 2011] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the accused, Hari Om (A-1), against the judgment and order dated 14.05.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal no. 190- DB of 2004, which in turn, arises out of judgment dated

[Criminal Appeal No.906 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No.913 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No.912 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 911 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 908 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 900-902 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal Nos.909-910 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No.914 of 2012] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. These appeals have been directed against the

[Criminal Appeal No. 242 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No.2328 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.8457 of 2014] [Crl. M.P. No.15455 of 2014] [Criminal Appeal No.242 of 2012] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. High Court of Delhi has, while dismissing writ petition No.4652 of 2010 filed by the appellant, affirmed the orders passed by the

[Criminal Appeal No. 2327 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 9751/2011] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Whether the charges under Section 406 IPC and the criminal complaint for criminal breach of trust for allegedly retaining the bill amount payable to respondent No.2 is liable to be quashed is the point falling