Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 9947 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19555 of 2012] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 1.3.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka whereby Regular First Appeal No.265 of 1999 filed by the […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 4215-4216 of 2007] S. Natarajan (Dead) through LRS. Vs. Inbasegaran and another [Civil Appeal Nos.4217-4218 of 2007] S. Natarajan (Dead) Thr. LRS. Vs. Inbasegaran [Civil Appeal Nos.4219 of 2007] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 30.4.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature

[Civil Appeal No. 9951 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.15445 of 2010] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 10th December, 2009 in R.S.A. No.790 of 2008 delivered by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, this appeal has been filed by

[Criminal Appeal No. 1381 of 2011] KURIAN, J.: Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire literally means no one at the point of death is presumed to lie. Nobody normally may lie and die for fear of meeting his maker. Acceptability and reliability of statement made by a person who is about to die, which statement, in common

[Civil Appeal Nos. 9949-9950 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.35800-35801 of 2011] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The plaintiff filed two suits, one for specific performance of agreement and other for grant of permanent injunction in relation to the suit house. The trial court vide common judgment and decree dated

[Criminal Appeal No. 2475 of 2009] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. 1. This appeal at the instance of A1, who is the appellant herein, is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated 16.08.2007, passed in Criminal Appeal No.434 of 2006. 2. Brief facts which are required to be

[Special Leave Petition Nos. 34782-34783 of 2012] DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. The factual exposition that is capable of being encapsulated in a real small compass, has, with some passage of time and turn of events, grown into a colossal structure having the effect potentiality to amaze and perplex any prudent man. The chronology of events

[Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. The first respondent is a company under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). Two appellants herein who are mother (since deceased) and son respectively are minority shareholders holding or otherwise controlling 17 per cent of the equity in the first respondent company.

[Civil Appeal No. 2415 of 2003] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Short point falling for consideration in this appeal is whether kitchen of the appellant-club and catering section thereon come within the meaning of “factory” and “manufacturing process” as defined in Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short ‘ESI Act’). 2. The appellant-Delhi Gymkhana Club is

[Civil Appeal No. 9931 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.11990/2008] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Whether or not New Mangalore Port Listed Workers Managing Committee is an integral part of New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) and whether State Government is the “appropriate government” to extend the applicability of provisions of Employees