Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No. 2310 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 2659/2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Delay in filing and refilling SLP condoned and leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the Order dated 26.06.2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Revision No.2303/2007, in and by which, […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 9927-28 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.1499-1500 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 9929-30 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 29128-29129 of 2014 (Cc Nos.4232-4233 of 2014)] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL J. 1. Delay condoned in SLP (C) No. of 2014 [CC. Nos.4232-4233 of 2014]. 2. Leave granted in all

[Civil Appeal No. 5225 of 2008] S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. This appeal is placed before us by way of a reference, made by a two- Judge Bench of this Court, C.K. Thakker and Altamas Kabir, JJ. which heard the matter on an earlier occasion and held that the appeal deserves to be allowed and

[Criminal Appeal No.2228 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1724 of 2013] Gunmala Sales Private Ltd., etc. Vs. Navkar Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. & etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos.2261-2265 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) Nos.5500-5504 of 2013] Gunmala Sales Private Ltd., etc. Vs. Navkar Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. & etc.

[Criminal Appeal No.2267 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1453 of 2013] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave arises out of judgment and order dated 3.1.2013 of the High Court of Uttarakhand in Criminal Appeal No.213 of 2006, whereby Division Bench of the High Court dismissed

[Civil Appeal Nos.9844-9846 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 23051-23053 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated 20.3.2009, passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Calcutta in W.P.L.R.T. Nos. 728 of 2002, 429

[Civil Appeal No. 9849 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 18639 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. This appeal, preferred by the State of Uttar Pradesh and its functionaries, assails the order of the High Court whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants has been dismissed and the order of the

[Civil Appeal Nos. 2545-2546/2012] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the impugned Orders dated 24.12.2010 and 13.10.2011 passed by Delhi High Court in L.A. Appeal No.149/2007 and C.M. No.735/2011 in L.A. Appeal No.149/2007 respectively by which High Court awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.14,974/- per sq. yard for appellants’ land acquired

[Civil Appeal No.7696 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.972 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.974 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.975 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.973 of 2010] J.S.KHEHAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applications for impleadment are dismissed as no ground for impleadment is made out. 3. The State of Uttaranchal (now

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 853 of 2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 854/2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 855/2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 857/2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 883/2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 867/2014] [Writ Petition(C) No. 884/2014] Dipak Misra, J Education is the spine of any civilised society. Formal education has its own significance, for it depends upon systemic imparting of