Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 2641 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 2642 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 2643 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 2616 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 9828 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No. 9015 of 2014] J.S. KHEHAR, J. : 1. The respondent – Pronab Chakraborty was inducted into the employment of the […]

[Civil Appeal No. 9744 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.5694 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. The petitioner-wife Dipanwita Roy and the respondent-husband Ronobroto Roy, were married at Calcutta. Their marriage was registered on 9.2.2003. The present controversy emerges from a petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

[Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19552 of 2013] Chelameswar, J. 1. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in suit No .632 of 2010 on the file of the Special Civil Judge (Senior Division), Thane and the respondents are the defendants therein. For the sake of convenience they are referred to in this judgment as they

[Civil Appeal No. 9722 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.13844 of 2013] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. Leave granted. 1. The Appellants essay to restore the concurrent views of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Rewari, in Civil Suit No.308 of 1997 in terms of the Judgment and Decree dated 27.8.2002, as also the Judgment and

[Civil Appeal Nos. 9689-9690 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.25939-25940 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 9691 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3568 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9692 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3570 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9693 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.3969 of

[Criminal Appeal No.785 of 2010] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the Order dated 22nd December, 2005, of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.1818 of 2004 setting aside the conviction of the accused- respondent Nos.1 and 2 passed by the Trial Court under Sections 498-A

[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28189 of 2014 Cc No.2940 of 2014] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28195-96 of 2014 Cc No.1707 of 2014] O R D E R ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Delay condoned. Heard on merits. 2. These petitions have been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 27th September, 2013 passed

[Criminal Appeal No(S). 729-732 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. These appeals are filed by four appellants, who were arrayed as accused persons in the complaint case No.183/2007 filed by the respondent herein before the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu. The complaint has been filed under Sections 120-B, 468, 420 and 500

[Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2007] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. The instant Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25-8-2005 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 828 of 1999 whereby setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court allowed the appeal filed

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2199-2201 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) Nos.1730-1732 of 2011] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 2.2.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Crl.M.C. Nos.2955 and 3779 of 2009 and Crl.Rev.No. 575 of 2009, whereby the High Court