Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 3008-3009 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 4580 of 2010] RANJAN GOGOI, J. The controversy in the present appeals arises out of the claim of the respondent-writ petitioner, a housing society, to Transferrable Development Rights (TDR) under the relevant Development Control Regulations (DCR) i.e. N-2.4 framed under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning […]

[Civil Appeal No. 9378 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 37274/2012] O R D E R R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In this appeal, short question falling for consideration is whether the appellant be granted leave to defend the eviction petition filed by the respondents-landlords. 3. Appellant is a tenant in

[Civil Appeal No. 9379 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.33798/2012] M/s. R.S. Labour and TPT. Contractor Vs. Food Corporation of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 9380 of 2014 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 3928/2013] R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. These appeals arise out of common order of the Punjab and

[Criminal Appeal No. 1366 of 2010] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short the “IPC”). Under Section 304-B IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years while

[Civil Appeal Nos. 3982-3987 of 2011] [C.A. Nos.7916-7918 of 2011] [C.A. No. 10207 of 2011] [C.A. Nos. 7547-7549 of 2013] [C.A. Nos. 7707-7709 of 2013] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. These groups of appeals have been filed against the impugned Judgment and order dated 10.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at

[Criminal Appeal No. 775 of 2007] Surang Lal Yadav Vs. State of Bihar [Criminal Appeal No. 1163 of 2007] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. These appeals are preferred by the appellants/accused aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 566 of

[Criminal Appeal Nos. 1973-1974 of 2008] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This is an exceptional case where this Court has taken serious note, the way the Sessions Judge disposed of the Sessions case within a period of nine days, which can be briefly narrated herein-below: 29.12.2004: Charges were framed and the case was adjourned to 1.1.2005.

[Civil Appeal No.9264 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1117 of 2010] City Industrial Development Thr. Its Managing Director Vs. Platinum Square Trust And ANR. [Civil Appeal No.9265 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.1215 of 2010] City Industrial Development Thr. Its Managing Director Vs. Popcorn Entertainment Corporation

[Criminal Appeal No. 2079 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 4th February, 2009 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.304 of 2003 whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal of the appellants and remanded

[Civil Appeal No. 6957 of 2009] J.S. KHEHAR, J. 1. On 16.07.2002, the Punjab State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Board’) took a decision to fill up 21 posts of Accounts Officer. The above posts were to be filled up by way of direct recruitment. The appellant earned 164 marks in the process