[Civil Appeal No. 5342 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 5343 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 5344 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 5345 of 2023] Sanjiv Khanna, J. I.A. Nos. 1 of 2017 and 27407 of 2023. 1. I.A. Nos. 1 of 2017 and 27407 of 2023, for permission to take on record additional evidence in […]
A. Valliammai Vs. K.P. Murali and Ors. Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2014] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. Heard Shri Ranjan Mukherjee and Ms. Astha Sharma, learned counsel for the parties. 2. In Sessions Trial No. 05/1998 arising from Sessions Case No. 37/1997 pursuant to the FIR No.110/1993 lodged under Sections 341, 302 read with 34 of IPC at Jhalda Police Station, Purulia,
Bhaktu Gorain & Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No(s). 2242 of 2023] [Criminal Appeal No(s). 2243 of 2023] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. These appeals1 arise from a final order2 of the Delhi High Court rejecting a petition for quashing criminal proceedings, filed by the DBS Bank India Limited (second respondent in the first appeal /appellant in second the appeal) (hereafter
Religare Finvest Ltd. Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 377 of 2007] [Criminal Appeal No. 2763/2023 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4364 of 2011] Vikram Nath, J. Crl. Appeal No. 377/2007. 1. This Constitution Bench has been constituted to consider whether the declaration made by a Constitution Bench of this Court, in the case of Subramanian Swamy vs. Director, Central
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Vs. R.R. Kishore Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5590 of 2021] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Factual Background 1. An agreement was entered into on 02.08.2006 between the appellant and M/s KST Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Corporate Debtor’), for development of land licensed with the appellant admeasuring 8 acres into a residential group housing complex at Faridabad,
M/s. RPS Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Mukul Kumar & Anr. Read More »
[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2628-2629 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) Nos. 8506-8507/2022] 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The two appeals arise out of the orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Application No.14899/2022 filed by the respondents-accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Zunaid Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Read More »
[Criminal Appeal Nos. 2643-2644 of 2023 arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) Nos. 6854-6855 of 2023] Abhay S.Oka, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-State. 3. The present appellant-Niranjan Das was Accused No.2 before the Trial Court. He was convicted by the
Niranjan Das @ Niru Das @ Mahanto Vs. State of West Bengal Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (C) No. 31526 of 2017] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. Shri Parthiv K. Goswami, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Shri Tanmaya Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents were heard on merits. 2. Under challenge is the judgment and order dated 04.09.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court whereby
Jagpal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3423 of 2017 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 33070/2013] KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as “the Management”) is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court whereby the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the employee”) was directed to be reinstated in service with 50 per
[Civil Appeal No.6549 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.6550, 6551, 6552, 6553, 6554, 6555, 6556-6561 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos.4327, 4328, 4329, 4330, 4331 and 4332 of 2015 @ SLP (C) Nos.29275, 29267, 34936, 35196, 34882 of 2014 and SLP (C) No.2623 Of 2015] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.1057 of 2014] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J: Leave granted
Recent SC Judgement – HC Pradeep Kumar Rai Vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey – 11.05.15 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
