Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.9048 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.10849 of 2013] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.9.2012 passed by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court whereby appeal preferred by the appellant against the order […]

[Civil Appeal Nos.3434-3435 of 2001] [Civil Appeal No.3438 of 2001] [Civil Appeal Nos.3436-3437 of 2001] [Civil Appeal No.3439 of 2001] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The appellants are the owners of Hotels, Beach Resorts and Beach Bungalows in Goa who have been facing the prospect of demolition of their properties for the last several decades. The

[Civil Appeal No. 9043 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.12019 of 2014] CHELAMESWAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The unsuccessful petitioner in the Writ Petition No.87(S/B)/2014 on the file of the High court of Allahabad is the appellant herein. By the impugned judgment dated 3.4.2014 the said writ petition was dismissed

[Criminal Appeal No. 1816 of 2009] M.Y. EQBAL, J. 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.1044 of 1998, whereby the High Court allowed appeal of one of the four accused persons and dismissed appeal of the other three

[Criminal Appeal No.605 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 1924 of 2014] [Criminal Appeal No. 1925 of 2014] JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. In the order of 03.04.2012, a two-Judge Bench of this Court granted leave in SLP (Crl.) No.5761 of 2010. The Court formulated the following two questions for consideration: (i) Can cognizance of an

[Criminal Appeal No. 2048 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 6461 of 2011] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The centripodal issue that strikingly emerges, commanding the judicial conscience to ponder and cogitate with reasonable yard-stick of precision, for consideration how far a superior court should proceed to analyse the factual score in exercise of

[Civil Appeal No.2143 of 2007] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the two separate impugned orders dated 14.2.2005 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 6916 of 2004 by both the members of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh and against the order dated 26.04.2006

[Criminal Appeal No. 632 of 2011] [Criminal Appeal No. 633 of 2011] A.K. SIKRI, J. These two appeals arise out of concurrent order of conviction passed by the courts below convicting these two appellants, viz. Vijay Thakur and Surjeet Khachi, along with third accused, namely, Rajinder Thakur under Section 302 read with Section 34 of

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 469 of 2014] [W.P.(C) No. 700/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 705/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 706/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 707/2014] [SLP(C) No. 21765/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22755/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22756/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22757/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22758-22759/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22974/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 784/2014] [SLP(C) No. 23512/2014] [SLP(C) No. 23777/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 757/2014] [W.P.(C) No. 799/2014] [SLP(C) No. 22785/2014]

[Civil Appeal No. 8980 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 313 of 2012] Rajesh Kumar Tiwary Vs. The Union of India & Ors. [S.L.P. (Civil) No. 31006 of 2012] Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Civil) No. 313 of 2012. 2. The question for consideration is whether, on the cancellation