Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No.2070 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6220 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This is an unfortunate case where the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are rendered simply a pious hope of the Parliament and a teasing illusion for the appellant. […]

[Civil Appeal No. 4226 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: Construction by plaintiff, destruction by defendant. Construction by pleadings, proof by evidence; proof only by relevant and admissible evidence. Genuineness, veracity or reliability of the evidence is seen by the court only after the stage of relevancy and admissibility. These are some of the first principles of

[Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 281-282 of 2014 in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 34794-34795 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 9220 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15796 of 2014] [Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 281-282 of 2014 in Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 34794-34795 of 2011] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Mr. Sunil Kathuria, Chairman,

[Criminal Appeal Nos.2065-2066 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) Nos.4682-4683 of 2012] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The challenge in this appeal is to the orders dated 7/3/2012 and 12/3/2012 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court allowing the criminal revision petition filed by

[Civil Appeal Nos.8973-8973 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 975-976 of 2012] S. A. BOBDE, J. Leave granted. In these appeals, the question before us is whether having regard to the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as ‘RDB Act’], a suit containing

[Civil Appeal Nos. 8791-8818 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.36425-36452 of 2009] [Civil Appeal Nos. 8819-8831 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.36616-36628 of 2009] [Civil Appeal Nos. 832-8833 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.171-172 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 8834 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C)

[Criminal Appeal No.667 of 2011] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Mishribai for which they stand sentenced to life imprisonment apart from conviction and sentence of appellant Gul Singh @

[Criminal Appeal No.2358 of 2010] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offences under Sections 450 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for which the appellant stands sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years under both heads but the sentences

[Criminal Appeal No. 2051 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.1235 of 2012] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment dated 10th July, 2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No.292 of 2005 altering the

[Criminal Appeal No. 2055 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.4656 of 2011] ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the Order dated 2nd May, 2011 of the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants under Section 406