Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No.6651 of 2008] ARUN MISHRA, J. In the case in hand, the Court is required to adjudicate upon the issue whether Freedom Fighter pension had been undeservingly extended to respondent No.1 inspite of the fact that he did not participate in freedom struggle as he was a child of 7 to 8 years […]

[Criminal Appeal No. 1985 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9854 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. As counsel for both the parties expressed their willingness to argue the matter finally at this stage, we heard the appeal finally. This appeal is preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh against

[Civil Appeal No. 8614 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 38519 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, the appellant herein, has filed the instant appeal challenging the propriety of orders dated February 27, 2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ

[Criminal Appeal No. 639 of 2011] Chelameswar, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 6th January 2010 of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.506 of 2004. 2. By the impugned judgment, the High Court confirmed the appellant’s conviction and sentence of imprisonment for life and a

[Civil Appeal No.8700 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.8701 of 2013; 8702 of 2013 8703 of 2013; and 8704 of 2013] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. These civil appeals have been heard together because they involve common questions of law and fact and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. Whereas in

[Civil Appeal No. 6691 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No. 4808 of 2013] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. This matter has come before a three Judge Bench by an order of reference of a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court dated 7th April, 2010. The referral order reads thus: “In this appeal, the question that arises for

[Civil Appeal No.3630 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3594-3611 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3631 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3647 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3632 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3633 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3634 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3635 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3636 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3638 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3646 of 2010]

[Civil Appeal No.7314-7365 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No.77-273 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.613-627 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.5058 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.4683 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.4599 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.5059 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.5237 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.5238 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.4744 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No. 8599 of

[Writ Petition (C) No. 536 of 2012] Rajni Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (C) No. 26 of 2014] Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. These petitions seek directions to the Government of India to intervene and expedite release of Indian Seamen held hostages by the Somalian Pirates in the international waters on

[Criminal Appeal No.937 of 2008] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. This appeal, at the instance of the State of Rajasthan is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench dated 08.02.2007 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.977 of 2002. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench set aside