Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal Nos. 8459-8462 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.9694-9697 of 2012] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is filed by the appellant wife being not satisfied with the order of the High Court of Madras in CMA Nos.543 and 933 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010 […]

[Civil Appeal No. 8458 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.9592 of 2012] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.2.2011 of the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No.481 of 2011 the unsuccessful appellants therein preferred the instant appeal. 3. The appellants are three

[Civil Appeal No.76 of 2009] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. A non-speaking arbitral award in favour of the appellant-company was set aside by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi on the ground that the Arbitrator had not recorded his “findings” as required under Clause 70 of the General Conditions of Contract. Relying

[Civil Appeal No.3415 of 2007] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. This appeal arises out of an order dated 10th February, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby OSA No.24 of 2006 filed by the appellant-Corporation has been partly allowed and the order passed by a single bench of

[Civil Appeal No. 8469 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.35762/2009] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of a judgment dated 23rd September, 2009 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) No. 11911 of 2009 whereby the High Court has invoked its

[Criminal Appeal No.1503 of 2007] M. Y. Eqbal, J. 1. The appellant was put on trial along with co-accused Sarbananda Das for offence under section 302/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the ‘IPC’). The Additional Sessions Judge, Jorhat by judgment dated 30.03.2006 in Sessions Case No.27 (J.J.) of 2005, acquitted the co-accused Sarbananda

[Civil Appeal No.8463 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013] M.Y. Eqbal, J.: 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.4.2013 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (in short, “National Commission”) whereby Revision Petition No.4951 of

[Criminal Appeal No. 499 of 2011] Jaysukh Bavanji Shingalia Vs. State of Gujarat and Another [Criminal Appeal No. 2105 of 2013] Malabhai Shalabhai Rabari and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2108-2112 of 2013] Kalubhai Dulabhai Khachar Vs. State of Gujarat and Another [Criminal Appeal No.2107 of 2013] Sondabhai Hanubhai Bharwad

[Civil Appeal No.459 of 1997] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. On 12.11.1951, the Uttar Pradesh Official Language Act, 1951 (U.P. Act No.XXVI of 1951) (for short, ‘1951 Act’) was published in Gazette Extraordinary and came into force. 1951 Act was passed in Hindi by the U.P. Legislative Assembly on 27.09.1951 and by the U.P Legislative Council

[Civil Appeal No. 8434 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 22487 of 2012] 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 09.01.2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in L.P.A. No. 20 of 2012, whereby the High Court dismissed the