Recent Judgement

State of Himachal Pradesh & ANR. Vs. Tilak Raj [Civil Appeal No.9124 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.404 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9125 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.407 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9126 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.4106 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9127 of 2014 arising out […]

Chandigarh Administration & Another Vs. Jasmine Kaur & others [Civil Appeal Nos. 8377-8378 of 2014 @ SLP (C) Nos.18137-18138 of 2014] Jessica Rehsi Vs. Chandigarh Administration & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.8376 of 2014 @ SLP (C) No.18099 of 2014] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been preferred against the orders passed

  [Civil Appeal No. 8373 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.35021 of 2013] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. Leave granted. Heard Mr. Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate for the respondent. The appellant was required to set up some plant or boiler units. For completing that work,

[Civil Appeal Nos. 69-70 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: The simple question arising for consideration in this case is whether the averments in the election petition disclose a cause of action as required under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’). Incidentally, it may be noted that

[Civil Appeal No.352 of 2009] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants against the final judgment and order dated 02.02.2005 passed in A.S. No. 678 of 1993(C) by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, whereby the High Court has set aside the judgment and decree passed in the Original

[Civil Appeal No.7705 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 4895 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment and order dated 05.06.2013 passed in M.F.A. No. 21576 of 2012 by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad, wherein the High Court

[Criminal Appeal No. 679 of 2013] Dipak Misra, J. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (“TADA” for short) assailing the judgment passed by the Designated Court, Guwahati in TADA Sessions Case No. 47 of 2001, whereby the Designated Court has acquitted the Appellant under

[Civil Appeal No. 8283 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18676 of 2012] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. The respondent No. 1 instituted Civil Suit No. 78 of 2003 in the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patti, district Taran Taran, for specific performance of contract entered into between him

[Civil Appeal No.6177 of 2004] [Civil Appeal No.2162 of 2004] [Civil Appeal No.2901 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.6954 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No.7520 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No.5212 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.2859 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3313 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No.1224 of 2006 SLP (C) No.34303 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.7491 of 2004

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 of 2005] Dipak Misra, J. [for himself, R.M. Lodha, C.J., and S.A. Bobde, J.] A democratic polity, as understood in its quintessential purity, is conceptually abhorrent to corruption and, especially corruption at high places, and repulsive to the idea of criminalization of politics as it corrodes the legitimacy of the