Recent Judgement

ITEM No. 1A Court No. 3 SECTION XIIA (For Judgment) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Renikuntla Rajamma (D) by LRS. Vs. K. Sarwanamma [Civil Appeal No. 4195 of 2008] Date: 17.07.2014 This Petition was called on for judgment today. For Appellant (s) Mr. Nitin S.Tambwekar, Adv. Mr. B.S.Sai, Adv. Mr. K.Rajeev, Adv. For […]

[Criminal Appeal No.1523 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.8783 of 2013] (Smt.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is the complainant. He has challenged the judgment and order dated 21/03/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Writ Petition No.1131

[Civil Appeal Nos. 6046-6047 of 2004] R.M.LODHA, CJI. 1. On 23.12.1970 (1970 O.M.), the Department of Personnel issued Office Memorandum being O.M. No. 8/12/69-Estt.(SCT) relaxing standards in the case of Scheduled Castes/Tribes candidates in departmental competitive examinations and in departmental confirmation examinations. The said O.M. remained operative for about 17 years until O.M. No. 36012/23/96-Estt.(Res)

[Criminal Appeal No.1381 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.4018 of 2012] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants questioning the correctness of the judgment and final order dated 11.08.2010 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 2005 in setting aside

[Civil Appeal No. 6396 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.31619 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and final order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in L.A.A. no.995 of 2010. 3. The property of the appellants

[Criminal Appeal No.1331 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 1565 of 2013] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. The two issues that pronouncedly emanate in this appeal by special leave are whether the Family Court while deciding an application under Section 7 of the Family Court Act, 1984 (for brevity, “the Act”) which includes

[Civil Appeal No. 127 of 2007] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18th July, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No. 109 of 2006. By the impugned judgment, the High Court affirmed the concurrent finding of the lower courts

[Civil Appeal No. 6284 of 2014 @Special Leave Petition (Civil.) No. 18367 of 2012] CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. The complainant-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated May 27, 2011 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the National Commission’), setting aside the Order dated July 14, 2006 of the Punjab State

[Civil Appeal No.1103 of 2004] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the judgment and order dated July 22, 2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appeal No.1806 of 1992. The High Court after perusing the facts and the evidence on record by the said judgment

[Criminal Appeal No. 1615 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Bihar and others against the judgment dated 7th May, 2007 passed by the High Court Judicature at Patna in Cr.W.J.C. No.352 of 2002. By the impugned judgment the High Court giving reference to the provisions