Recent Judgement

[Civil Appeal No. 6718 of 2013] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. We are informed that Dr. Aloys Wobben (appellant no.1, hereinafter referred to as, ‘the appellant’) is a scientist-engineer. It is also the case of the appellant, that he has to his credit several inventions in the field of wind turbine generators, and wind energy […]

[Civil Appeal No. 5765 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 20041 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi rendered in OMP No.46 of 2013 dated 22nd March, 2013. By the aforesaid judgment, the Delhi

[Civil Appeal No. 3879 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. This is a statutory appeal, preferred by Union of India, as provided under Section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AFT Act’). The appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated April 15, 2011 passed by the Armed

[Arbitration Petition No. 34 of 2013] SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 11(4) read with Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Arbitration Act”), with a prayer to appoint the nominee arbitrator of the Respondent and to further constitute the arbitral tribunal, by

[Criminal Appeal No(S).1570 of 2010] O R D E R A.K. SIKRI,J. The appellant was running a small kirana shop at 96-A, MIG Flats, Opposite G.T.B. Hospital, G.T.B. Enclave, Shahdara, Delhi. On 11.3.1993, some officials from the Food Adulteration Department visited his shop which was being run under the name and style “M/s Mithlesh General

[Criminal Appeal No. 555 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Contempt Application (Crl.) No. 15 of 2009, by which the appellant stood convicted for committing criminal contempt under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

[Criminal Appeal No. 2231 of 2010] Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 20.1.2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal appeal No.499-DB of 2001, affirming the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat dated 4.9.2001/7.9.2001, passed

[Criminal Appeal No.1636 of 2011] Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 6.10.2009, passed by the High Court of Tamil Nadu (Madurai Bench) in Criminal Appeal (MD) No.540 of 2008 affirming the judgment and order dated 18.11.2008, passed in Sessions Case No.18 of 2001 by

[Criminal Appeal No. 1563 of 2010] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. That the present statutory appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 23.3.2010 whereby the High Court has convicted the appellant by reversing the judgment of the Trial Court, which had acquitted the appellant of the charges under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and

[Criminal Appeal No. 1521 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1526-1527 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1519 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1528 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Six persons were accused of conspiring with each other and committing murder of one Ramesh Masta with common intention. FIR No. 414 dated November 06, 2004 was registered