Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No. 1118 of 2014] A.K. SIKRI, J. The two appellants herein are aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court pronounced on July 27, 2011, whereby their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’), as recorded by the Magistrate, has been upheld and […]

[Civil Appeal Nos. 5589-5605 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5606-5608 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5609-5611 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5612 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5613 of 2014] [Civil Appeal Nos. 5614-5621 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5622 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5623 of 2014] [Civil Appeal No. 5624 of 2014] A.K.

[Civil Appeal No.6717 of 2008] Dipak Misra, J. 1. Calling in question the legal defensibility of the judgment and order dated 19.01.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C)No.16104 of 2004 whereby it has annulled the judgment and order dated 28.06.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short

ITEM NO.1C COURT NO.2 SECTION II SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Md. Jamiluddin Nasir Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal No(S). 1240-1241 of 2010] Aftab Ahmed Ansari @Aftab Ansari Vs. State of West Bengal [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1242-1243 of 2010] Date: 21/05/2014 These Appeals were called on for pronouncement of judgment today.

ITEM NO.1A COURT NO.2 SECTION IV [FOR JUDGMENT] SUPREME COURT OF INDIA B.S. Sandhu Vs. Government of India & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4684-4685 of 2005] Dashmesh Educational Society Vs. Punjab Urban Development Authority & Ors.] [Civil Appeal No. 4799-4800 of 2005] SURESH SHARMA & ORS. Vs. B.S. SANDHU & ORS. [Civil Appeal NO. 4798

[Civil Appeal Nos. 7201-7202 of 2008] Dipak Misra, 1. The respondent while holding the post of District Manager in the Food Corporation of India (for short the FCI) was proceeded against in a disciplinary proceedings as contemplated under Regulation 60 of the Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 (for brevity “the Regulations”) on the

[Criminal Appeal No. 147 of 2009] Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.5.2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2681 of 1982, by which the High Court has affirmed the judgment and order passed by the IInd Additional

[Civil Appeal No.2273 of 2011] Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and decree dated 1.12.2009 in Regular Second Appeal No.2299 of 2009, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, affirming the judgment and decree dated 16.9.2008, passed by the Additional District Judge, Amritsar

[Criminal Appeal No. 45 of 2011] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. These appeals are filed by the convicted accused appellants as they are aggrieved by the conviction and sentences awarded to them by the Special Court (POTA), and confirmed by the High Court of Gujarat for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian

[Criminal Appeal No. 1342 of 2012] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. This appeal arises out of Judgment and order dated 3 rd March, 2011 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upholding the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, IPC. 2.