Recent Judgement

[Civil Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition (C) No.429 of 2014] DIPAK MISRA, J. 1. The petitioner, a practising advocate of this Court, as pro bone publico has preferred this writ petition with Article 32 of the Constitution with the following prayers: a. “Issue a writ of mandamus in public interest or any other appropriate writ, order, […]

[Civil Appeal No. 888 of 2009] Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal, the question that is required to be determined is whether the High Court by the order impugned was justified in invalidating the election of the appellant who was elected as a member of Bihar Legislative Assembly in the election held on 10.7.2003.

[Civil Appeal Nos.7227-7257 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.5161-5191 of 2001] [Civil Appeal Nos.7258-7311 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.15196-15249 of 2002] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted. All these appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 11.9.2000 in LPA No.210 of 1999 and connected appeals passed by the Division Bench

[Civil Appeal No. 7174 Of 2014 arising out of SLP(C) No.9914 of 2012] [C.A. No.7175 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) No.10363/2012] [C.A. Nos.7195-7201 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) Nos.18158-18164/2012] [C.A. No.7177 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) No.18420/2012] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In these appeals the appellants have challenged the common judgment and order dated

[Civil Appeal Nos. 7167-7168 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 38898-38899 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Present appeals raise an interesting question of law pertaining to the form and content of show cause notice, that is required to be served, before deciding as to whether the noticee

[Civil Appeal Nos.7164-7166 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 23016-23018 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. By the common judgment dated 29.02.2012, the Madras High Court has decided three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the

[Civil Appeal No.7191 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.9942 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. Being aggrieved by an interim order passed in a civil suit, the appellants- original defendants have approached this Court by way of this appeal. The matter has arisen under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act,

[Criminal Appeal No. 2287 of 2009] [Criminal Appeal No. 1593 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.2077 of 2009]; [Criminal Appeal No. 1594 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.2112 of 2009]; [Criminal Appeal No. 1595 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.2117 of 2009]; [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1596-1600 of 2014 arising

[Criminal Appeal No.592 of 2010] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 19.02.2008 passed by the Madurai Bench of High Court of Madras in Criminal Appeal (MD) No. 3 of 2007 urging various grounds and legal contentions and prayed to set aside the

[Civil Appeal No. 7113 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 25015 of 2011] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard learned counsel on behalf of the parties. The appellant (since deceased) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 14.03.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in LPA