Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No.719 of 2010] Chandrakanta Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No.720 of 2010] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 18th August, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Criminal Appeal No.388 of 2005. By the impugned judgment […]

[Criminal Appeal No.1466 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 16.3.2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No.353 of 2004. The appellants herein are accused nos.1 to 3 in the case in Sessions Trial No.8/97, on the file of Additional Sessions

[Criminal Appeal No.1364 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.7039 of 2007] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13th August, 2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.2380 of 2004. By the impugned judgment, the High Court

[Civil Appeal No.172 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.173 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.177 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.178 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.179 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.180 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.186 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.187 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.1916 of 2011] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. All these appeals have been

[Criminal Appeal No.1365 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.3051/2008] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11th December, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.26878 of 2007. By the impugned judgment, the High Court

[Civil Appeal No.6018 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.29807 of 2012] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10th May, 2012 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur whereby the Division Bench allowed the

[Civil Appeal No. 9052 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.21668 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 9053/2014 @ SLP(C) No. 22442 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 9054/2014 @ SLP(C) No. 22452 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 9055/2014 @ SLP(C) No. 22511 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 9056/2014 @ SLP(C) No. 23047 of 2012] [Civil

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 386 of 2005] Chandramauli Kr. Prasad All India Muslim Personal Law Board comprises of Ulemas. Ulema is a body of Muslim scholars recognised as expert in Islamic sacred law and theology. It is the assertion of the petitioner that All India Muslim Personal Law Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Board’)

[Criminal Appeal No.1359 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 3020 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No.1362 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 3022 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No.1361 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 3016 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No.1360 of 2014 arising out

[Civil Appeal No. 5954 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 33200 of 2014] Dipak Misra Leave granted. In this appeal by special leave the plaintiff-appellant has called in question the legal sustainability of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in OSA No. 229