Recent Judgement

[Criminal Appeal No. 1708 of 2009] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th October, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Revision Application No.321 of 2004. By the impugned judgment, the High Court set aside the judgment dated 29th May, 2004 […]

[Criminal Appeal No.684 of 2011] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J 1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 471-SB of 1999 whereby the High Court confirmed the judgment and order dated 23rd April, 1999 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge,

[Criminal Appeal No. 292 of 2011] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 3rd February, 2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRA No.909-SB of 1997. By the impugned common judgment the High Court dismissed the revision application preferred by the appellant and

[Civil Appeal No. 8605 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15th April, 1998 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Civil First Appeal No.1 of 1995. By the impugned judgment and decree the High Court allowed the appeal,

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.229 of 2004] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J 1. The petitioner, who was convicted for the offence u/s 302/34 IPC, has preferred this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in the nature of habeas corpus for setting the petitioner at liberty from the illegal custody in the prison/correctional Home.

[Criminal Appeal No. 165 of 2004] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 166-167 of 2004] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J. 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 9th December, 2002 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.326/99 c/w Criminal Appeal No. 310/99. By the impugned judgment High Court reversed the judgment of

[Criminal Appeal No. 1424 of 2012] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24th September, 2010 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 495 of 2005 maintaining their conviction and sentence under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC, the appellants have filed

[Criminal Appeal No. 375 of 2010] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. The appellants, who were convicted under Sections 302/149 and 148, IPC by the Trial Court and whose conviction was altered by the High Court to Section 302/34, IPC, have filed this appeal by way of special leave, having been dissatisfied with the judgment and order

[Criminal Appeal Nos.1535-1538 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Lichman & ANR [Criminal Appeal No.1539 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Vazir & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No.1540 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Hoshiyar Singh & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 1541 of 2004] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. These appeals arise out of a

[Civil Appeal Nos.5899-5900 of 2014 arising out of SLP (c) Nos.16958-59 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. As facts of both the appeals are similar, at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, both the appeals had been heard together. Being aggrieved by the judgments delivered by the High Court