Law Intellect India

Government may not act on Cipla’s patent plea

The move by the Indian generics firm was the latest demand before the government to use flexibilities available in the Patents Act to issue a compulsory licence, which effectively waives the patent rights and allows a local player to manufacture the medicine and share a part of the revenue as royalty to the patent holder.
The move by the Indian generics firm was the latest demand before the government to use flexibilities available in the Patents Act to issue a compulsory licence, which effectively waives the patent rights and allows a local player to manufacture the medicine and share a part of the revenue as royalty to the patent holder.

NEW DELHI: In a setback to Cipla, the homegrown generics medicine company, the government has so far found little merit in its plea for waiver and cancellation of patent rights for five drugs over which Novartis has exclusive rights.

Sources told TOI that the health ministry has suggested that Cipla’s proposal for a compulsory licence for the medicines under section 92 of the Patents Act — a rarest of rare provision to be used in case of national emergency or in extreme urgency or for public non-commercial use — may not be “fit” to pass legal scrutiny.

And, with several patent disputes related to Novartis’ respiratory drug Onbrez already in court, the government is unlikely to use section 66 of the Patents Act, the other suggestion made by Cipla. In any case, the government has resorted to the use of section 66 only on two occasions — once in 1994 and a second time in 2012 — as the provision is meant to be used if a patent is “mischievous to the State or generally prejudicial to the public”.
Cipla had approached the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) a few months ago arguing that the patents should be revoked as Novartis imported small quantities of the medicine, estimated at around 54,000 units, allegedly depriving 1.5 crore patients who need the drug.

The move by the Indian generics firm was the latest demand before the government to use flexibilities available in the Patents Act to issue a compulsory licence, which effectively waives the patent rights and allows a local player to manufacture the medicine and share a part of the revenue as royalty to the patent holder.

So far, compulsory licence has been issued only once in 2012, when Natco was allowed to manufacture a cancer drug whose patent was held by Bayer. Sources said in the case of Cipla’s request, the health ministry has said if at all there is an argument for a compulsory licence, it should be considered under section 84. But, the government has no powers to use the provision.

TOI | Dec 15, 2014

Contact Lawyers In India : https://lawintellectindia.com/contact-us/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.