Law Intellect India

Satyam judgment put off to March 9

Hyderabad’s 21st additional chief metropolitan magistrate B V L N Chakravarthy, who heard the case on Tuesday, cited the voluminous records involved as the reason for putting off the verdict.
Hyderabad’s 21st additional chief metropolitan magistrate B V L N Chakravarthy, who heard the case on Tuesday, cited the voluminous records involved as the reason for putting off the verdict.

HYDERABAD: The much awaited verdict in the Satyam multi-crore scam case filed by the CBI, which was supposed to be delivered on Tuesday, is now scheduled to be pronounced on March 9, 2015.

Hyderabad’s 21st additional chief metropolitan magistrate B V L N Chakravarthy, who heard the case on Tuesday, cited the voluminous records involved as the reason for putting off the verdict.

“I have to go through some more documents and I want some more time,” the additional chief metropolitan magistrate said and posted the matter to March 9 next year.

Satyam’s founder chairman B Ramalinga Raju and other accused appeared in the court on Tuesday and were directed to be present in the court on March 9.

The same court which was also designated as the competent court to hear the case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the Satyam scam case is scheduled to hear the same on January 6, 2015.

TOI | Dec 24, 2014

Contact Lawyers In India : https://lawintellectindia.com/contact-us/

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.