Law Intellect India

SC rejects Centre’s plea for 11-judge bench NJAC’s hearing

he five jdge bench of justices JS Khehar, J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Goel gave three more days to Centre and petitioners challenging NJAC validity to conclude arguments.
he five jdge bench of justices JS Khehar, J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Goel gave three more days to Centre and petitioners challenging NJAC validity to conclude arguments.

NEW DELHI: In a major embarassment to the NDA government, the Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the Centre’s plea for referring the constitutional validity issue to a 11-judge bench.

A five-judge bench took a mid-way 37 minute break and returned to announce that it would not refer NJAC matter to 11-judge bench as was vehemently argued by attorney general Mukul Rohatgi and all BJP ruled states.

The five jdge bench of justices JS Khehar, J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Goel gave three more days to Centre and petitioners challenging NJAC validity to conclude arguments.

The SC also extended the term of all additional judges in high courts whose two year tenure was expiring during the pendency of petitions against NJAC, the new system which erased the 22-year-old collegium system for appointment of judges to SC and HC.

The SC said it will complete hearing and decide whether the matter requires recerence and also decide if needed the validity of NJAC.

TOI | May 12, 2015

Contact Lawyers In India : https://lawintellectindia.com/contact-us/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.