[Civil Appeal No. 8645 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.16210 of 2014] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 16th May 2014 of the High Court of Calcutta in A.P.O.T. No.460/2012, the respondent therein filed this appeal. 3. The impugned order is a reversing order in appeal […]
[Civil Appeal No.8632 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 21666 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8633 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 21670 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8634 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 21671 of 2013] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.
[Criminal Appeal No. 263 of 2013] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal, by special leave, is preferred by the appellant assailing the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 978-SB of 2003 whereby the learned Single Judge has affirmed the conviction recorded by
Recent SC Judgement – Sukhjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab – 11.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.5987-5988 of 2012] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum dated 02.12.2011 passed in Election Petition No.1 of 2011 and I.A. No. 3 of 2011. By the impugned judgment, the High Court, while allowing I.A. No. 3 of
Recent SC Judgement – C.P. John Vs. Babu M. Palissery – 11.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.6651 of 2008] ARUN MISHRA, J. In the case in hand, the Court is required to adjudicate upon the issue whether Freedom Fighter pension had been undeservingly extended to respondent No.1 inspite of the fact that he did not participate in freedom struggle as he was a child of 7 to 8 years
Recent SC Judgement – Union of India Vs. Jai Kishun Singh (D) through LRS. – 10.09.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1985 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9854 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. As counsel for both the parties expressed their willingness to argue the matter finally at this stage, we heard the appeal finally. This appeal is preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh against
Recent SC Judgement – State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Deepak – 10.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8614 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 38519 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. Leave granted. Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, the appellant herein, has filed the instant appeal challenging the propriety of orders dated February 27, 2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court has been informed by the city government’s food safety department that samples of rice dishes collected by it from two popular eateries here have been found to be unsafe. In an affidavit filed by the department, it said that the presence of artificial colour rendered the dishes “unsafe” for
Rice dish samples from KFC, Sagar Ratna found unsafe, Delhi HC told Read More »
Justice V R Krishna Iyer has passed on to the other world. He scored a century. He was unwell in body al though his spirit was, as always, indomitable. And yet, I cannot shake off a deep sense of grief. My generation, who learned from him of what the Supreme Court was all about, considered
Justice V R Krishna Iyer: Man who rescued Supreme Court from supreme shame Read More »
ALBANY (New York): A chimpanzee is not entitled to the rights of a human and does not have to be freed by its owner, a New York appeals court ruled on Thursday. The three-judge Appellate Division panel was unanimous in denying “legal personhood” to Tommy, which lives alone in a cage. A trial-level court had
Chimps don’t have same rights as humans: US court Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
