NEW DELHI: Concerned at rising pendency of cases older than five years in high courts, Chief Justice of India Justice H L Dattu has written to chief justices of all HCs asking them to ensure that such cases are not pending in any court, including the subordinate judiciary under them. Pendency of over five-year-old cases […]
CJI Dattu wants HC to clear over 5-year-old cases without delay Read More »
A new controversy may be brewing for the NDA government as the Solicitor General of India on Wednesday sought to argue on behalf of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in the Supreme Court in the black money case, amid allegation of “conflict of interest” by petitioner Ram Jethmalani. In a prelude to what can blow
Solicitor General wants to argue for black money SIT, SC says where’s the OK? Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court Wednesday dismissed bail plea of businessman Gautam Khaitan arrested in connection with the AgustaWestland VIP chopper deal. Justice VP Vaish said investigations into alleged money laundering by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is still on and once the ED wraps up probe Khaitan can file plea for bail. In his
VVIP chopper case: HC dismisses Gautam Khaitan’s bail plea Read More »
Resolute that people’s voices never go unheard before the highest court of the land, Chief Justice of India H L Dattu has set up a special bench, christened “Social Justice Bench”, to specifically deal with the issues troubling a common man in everyday life. This is the first time the Supreme Court will have a
CJI sets up ‘Social Justice Bench’ to address everyday issues of common man Read More »
MUMBAI: Two public interest litigation challenging the replacement of the word “Sindh” with “Sindhu” in the national anthem will come up for hearing in the Bombay High Court. Both petitions, filed last year, seek direction to the Maharashtra government to withdraw the text books reflecting the error. The first petition was filed by Mulund resident
Bombay HC to hear pleas against textbook error in national anthem Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 639 of 2011] Chelameswar, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 6th January 2010 of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.506 of 2004. 2. By the impugned judgment, the High Court confirmed the appellant’s conviction and sentence of imprisonment for life and a
Recent SC Judgement – Sangili @ Sanganathan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu – 10.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.8700 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos.8701 of 2013; 8702 of 2013 8703 of 2013; and 8704 of 2013] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. These civil appeals have been heard together because they involve common questions of law and fact and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. Whereas in
[Civil Appeal No. 6691 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No. 4808 of 2013] R.F. Nariman, J. 1. This matter has come before a three Judge Bench by an order of reference of a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court dated 7th April, 2010. The referral order reads thus: “In this appeal, the question that arises for
Recent SC Judgement – State of West Bengal Vs. Associated Contractors – 10.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.3630 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3594-3611 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3631 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3647 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3632 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3633 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3634 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3635 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3636 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3638 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No.3646 of 2010]
INDORE: A BJP MLA on Tuesday allegedly thrashed 15 drug addicts who he claimed were harassing women in a park here, the incident which acquired a political hue after Congress criticized saying it highlights the law and order situation of the state. Eyewitnesses claimed that BJP MLA Sudarshan Gupta beat up 15 miscreants at the
BJP MLA thrashes 15 junkies for harassing women Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
