[Civil Appeal No.8546 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.20066 of 2008] PRAFULLA C.PANT,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The question before us in this appeal is whether the Division Bench of High Court has erred in law in setting aside the order of learned Single Judge quashing the First Information Report (for short, ‘FIR’) […]
[Civil Appeal No. 9282 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 9286 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 7004 of 2012] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. All the three appeals being directed against the common judgment and order of the High Court dated 18.08.2009 were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this order. 2. In the present
Recent SC Judgement – Leela Rajagopal Vs. Kamala Menon Cocharan– 08.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8487 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 31026 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 8489-8490 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 33518-33519 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No. 8488 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 4686 of 2012] [Civil Appeal No. 8491 of 2014 arising out of SLP
Recent SC Judgement – NTPC Kahalagaon Vs. Nakul Das– 05.09.14 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.47 of 2014] Harminder Singh Vs. State of Punjab [Criminal Appeal No.1929 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No.4071 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.4071 of 2013. 2. By these appeals, the two appellant challenge the veracity of the judgment of the High Court
Recent SC Judgement – Pargan Singh Vs. State of Punjab– 05.09.14 Read More »
MUMBAI : Bombay High Court has demanded to see by this evening a circular issued by the Maharashtra government to the police to provide interim protection to witnesses in criminal cases right from the stage of investigation. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice A S Gadkari questioned whether the government has issued
Show circular to cops for witness protection : HC to Maharastra govrnment Read More »
MUMBAI : Bombay High Court on Monday sentenced a man to one month simple imprisonment after holding him guilty of contempt of court for posting malicious content against the judicial system on social networking sites. A division bench of Justice V M Kanade and Justice Anuja Prabhudessai stayed their order to enable Dwarka Hiranandani (56)
Bombay HC sends man to prison for defaming judicial system online Read More »
Taking note of intelligence inputs that retired defence personnel were involved in training private commandos and arming them with illegal weapons to protect Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has decided to treat the issue as a public interest litigation. The division bench comprising Justices M Jeyapaul
Can’t use religious places as dumping ground for arms: HC Read More »
CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court wants security agencies to clamp down on Dera Sacha Sauda as it fears a Rampal-like confrontation with followers of this sect could see even more casualties. Taking cognizance of reports of weapons training inside the Dera, the court has referred the matter to the chief justice’s bench for
HC sees another Rampal in Dera chief Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.534 of 2007] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 9th September, 2005 delivered by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, in CMA No.476 of 2005, this appeal has been filed by M/s Harsha Constructions, a contractor, against Union of India and its authorities. Hereinafter, the appellant
Recent SC Judgement – M/s. Harsha Constructions Vs. Union of India– 05.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 8479-8482 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.19220-19223 of 2007] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. Leave granted. These appeals are further additions to the long list of service matters decided by High Courts and this Court resolving disputes between “Diploma Holder” and “Degree Holder” Engineers in the matter of eligibility for further
Recent SC Judgement – K.K. Dixit Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board– 05.09.14 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
