[Civil Appeal No. 1331 of 2001] R.M. LODHA, CJI : 1. It is not necessary to answer the reference for two reasons. 2. In the first place, there is already a three-Judge Bench decision, namely, U.D. Lama and Ors. Vs. State of Sikkim and Ors.1 on the issue referred by the two-Judge Bench. In U.D. […]
Recent SC Judgement – Asis Kumar Samanta Vs. State of West Bengal– 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 3380 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3381 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3383 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3384 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3385 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3386 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3387 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3388 of 2010] [Civil Appeal No. 3389-3392 of 2010] Dipak
A Parliamentary committee has approved the Bill to enhance the pecuniary jurisdiction of Delhi’s district courts. The Delhi High Court (amendment) Bill 2014 proposes that civil suits up to Rs 2 crore will be heard by the 11 district courts instead of the Delhi High Court. Currently, all suits above Rs 20 lakh are heard
District courts get nod to hear suits up to Rs 2 crore Read More »
CHENNAI: Tamil Nadu government on Friday moved Supreme Court with a prayer to restrain Kerala government from proceeding with the construction of a dam across river Pambar at Pattissery, a tributary of river Amaravathy. In its petition, the government also sought status quo of the project and not to proceed with the execution of any
Tamil Nadu moves SC against Kerala over Pambar dam Read More »
KOLKATA: The state government’s image took a beating on Friday as Calcutta high court appointed special officers to consider BJP’s application for the Amit Shah rally on Sunday. An elated BJP declared it a “historic victory” for the party, and chief minister Mamata Banerjee’s “defeat”. “Aaj court-e jitechi, kal vote-e jitbo (We won in court
Calcutta HC appoints observers to help BJP meet rally rules Read More »
The Supreme Court on Friday impelled the Centre to act urgently on “second generation reforms” and consider charging extra cess on privately-owned diesel vehicles and higher parking charges, among various other measures, to curb pollution in Delhi. The court urged the Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) to also consider advancing Euro IV and implement
SC suggests higher parking fee, cess on cars to cut pollution Read More »
[Civil Appeal No(S). 8103/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8104/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8105/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8106/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8107/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8108/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8109/2009] [Civil Appeal No. 8110/2009] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. The question of law that arises for consideration in all these appeals which are filed by the Commissioner of
[Civil Appeal Nos. 8459-8462 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.9694-9697 of 2012] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is filed by the appellant wife being not satisfied with the order of the High Court of Madras in CMA Nos.543 and 933 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010
Recent SC Judgement – V.K. Vasantha Kumari Vs. R. Sudhakar– 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8458 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.9592 of 2012] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.2.2011 of the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No.481 of 2011 the unsuccessful appellants therein preferred the instant appeal. 3. The appellants are three
Recent SC Judgement – H.A. Martin Vs. Moses Thambi Pillai.– 04.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.76 of 2009] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. A non-speaking arbitral award in favour of the appellant-company was set aside by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi on the ground that the Arbitrator had not recorded his “findings” as required under Clause 70 of the General Conditions of Contract. Relying
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
