JAIPUR: The Supreme Court rulings which were considered sacrosanct, have failed to make any impact on the mining in the Aravallis. Despite several orders of the SC and the National Green Tribunal (NGT), banning mining in the Aravallis, it continues unabated, levelling the range and clearing the forests in Tijara. Now, one can easily see […]
Aravallis vanish on Raj-Haryana border as mining continues Read More »
HUBBALLI: Sri Rama Sene national president Pramod Muthalik will file a public interest litigation in the Karnataka High Court, seeking a stay on the Kiss of Love (KOL) protest planned in Bengaluru. Muthalik told reporters here on Sunday: “We have issued a legal notice to the state chief secretary, home minister, Kannada and culture minister
Muthalik to file PIL against Kiss of Love Read More »
NEW DELHI: If a woman’s complaint accusing her husband and in-laws of cruelty under the dreaded Section 498A of Indian Penal Code turns out to be false, then the man is entitled to divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled. Allowing dissolution of marriage between K Srinivas and K Sunita, the court said, “We unequivocally find
False dowry charge ground for divorce, Supreme Court rules Read More »
Narendra Vs. State of Rajasthan [Criminal Appeal No. 1902 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 1800 of 2014] R. BANUMATHI, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 9.11.2011 passed by the Jodhpur Bench of Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Crl. Appeal No. 950/2004 by which
Recent SC Judgement – Narendra Vs. State of Rajasthan – 02.09.14 Read More »
State of Himachal Pradesh & ANR. Vs. Tilak Raj [Civil Appeal No.9124 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.404 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9125 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.407 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9126 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.4106 of 2011] [Civil Appeal No.9127 of 2014 arising out
Recent SC Judgement – State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Tilak Raj – 01.09.14 Read More »
Chandigarh Administration & Another Vs. Jasmine Kaur & others [Civil Appeal Nos. 8377-8378 of 2014 @ SLP (C) Nos.18137-18138 of 2014] Jessica Rehsi Vs. Chandigarh Administration & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.8376 of 2014 @ SLP (C) No.18099 of 2014] Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. Leave granted. These appeals have been preferred against the orders passed
Recent SC Judgement – Chandigarh Administration Vs. Jasmine Kaur – 01.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8373 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.35021 of 2013] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. Leave granted. Heard Mr. Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate for the respondent. The appellant was required to set up some plant or boiler units. For completing that work,
Recent SC Judgement – Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. Tata Projects Ltd. – 01.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 69-70 of 2012] KURIAN, J.: The simple question arising for consideration in this case is whether the averments in the election petition disclose a cause of action as required under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’). Incidentally, it may be noted that
Recent SC Judgement – Ashraf Kokkur Vs. K.V. Abdul Khader etc.– 29.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.352 of 2009] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants against the final judgment and order dated 02.02.2005 passed in A.S. No. 678 of 1993(C) by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, whereby the High Court has set aside the judgment and decree passed in the Original
[Civil Appeal No.7705 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 4895 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment and order dated 05.06.2013 passed in M.F.A. No. 21576 of 2012 by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad, wherein the High Court
Recent SC Judgement – Yerramma Vs. G. Krishnamurthy – 28.08.2014 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
