[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.77 of 2014] C. Muniappan & Others Vs. The Registrar, Supreme Court of India [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.137 of 2010] B.A. Umesh Vs. Registrar, Supreme Court of India [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.52 of 2011] Sundar @ Sundarrajan Vs. State by Inspector of Police & Others [Writ Petition (Criminal) No.39 of 2013] Yakub […]
[Civil Appeal No.3989 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3990 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3991 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3992 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3993 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3994 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.6111 of 2008] R.M. LODHA, CJI. 1. The common question for consideration in this group of seven appeals is whether teachers of privately
Recent SC Judgement – State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Pawan Kumar Divedi – 02.09.14 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5613 of 2010] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. The challenge herein is against the order dated 22.10.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the present appellants against an order dated 20.07.2009 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court. By the aforesaid orders
NEW DELHI: In a landmark verdict, Delhi high court on Monday directed playschools that were allotted land at concessional rates in the capital to offer 25% of their seats free of charge to children from the weaker sections. A division bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said Directorate of Education
Delhi high court wants 25% free EWS seats in playschools Read More »
NEW DELHI: Former Supreme Court judge CK Prasad is set to be appointed as the head of the Press Council of India. Information and broadcasting ministry sources said Prasad has been selected by a committee headed by Vice President Hamid Ansari yesterday and a communication has been received in this regard. Prasad will succeed justice
Former SC judge Prasad to succeed Katju as PCI chief Read More »
Vireshwar Singh & Ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 8414-8415 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 31023-31024 of 2011] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants are General Duty Medical Officers (GDMO) Grade-II who were appointed on ad hoc basis between 1986 and 1989. They are
Recent SC Judgement – Vireshwar Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi– 02.09.14 Read More »
Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. Vs. Triveni Sharan Mishra [Civil Appeal No. 4335 of 2007] PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6th January, 2006 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ Petition No. 542 of 2004 whereby the writ petition has
Kusha Laxman Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra [Criminal Appeal No.1414 of 2008] M. Y. Eqbal, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 09.01.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay passed in Criminal Appeal No.385 of 1999, this jail appeal by special leave has been filed by the accused. By the
Recent SC Judgement – Kusha Laxman Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra– 02.09.14 Read More »
Kamaljit Singh Vs. Sarabjit Singh [Civil Appeal No. 8410 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19532 of 2011] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 9th July, 2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby Civil Revision Petition No.580 of 2005
Recent SC Judgement – Kamaljit Singh Vs. Sarabjit Singh – 02.09.14 Read More »
It seems N Srinivasan’s return as BCCI president will not be a smooth affair. The Supreme Court has questioned his return to the top position in the Board of Control of Cricket in India, and asked him to address the question of conflict of interest. Quick notes: * Cricket must be played in its true
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
