Law Intellect India

admin

Supreme Court suggests Life Imprisonment for Adulteration in Milk and Milk products

The case of Swami Achyutanand Tirth & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. has been pending since 2012. The expose that has ensued due to Supreme Court orders is both disturbing and frightening. Milk is supposed to be a complete food. Everyone from children to adults drink it. Indians regularly consume it from their morning tea, […]

Supreme Court suggests Life Imprisonment for Adulteration in Milk and Milk products Read More »

SC sets aside HC’s bail of NUJS assistant registrar in molestation case

Supreme Court justices SJ Mukhopadhaya and NV Ramana have set aside a Calcutta high court order that declined to cancel the bail of former NUJS Kolkata assitant registrar Siddhartha Guha, who is accused of having sexually harassed another staff member at the college, reported the Times of India. The alleged victim, represented by advocates Siddharth Dave

SC sets aside HC’s bail of NUJS assistant registrar in molestation case Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Surjit Singh & Ors. Vs. Gurwant Kaur & Ors. – 27.08.2014

[Civil Appeal No. 8283 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18676 of 2012] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. The respondent No. 1 instituted Civil Suit No. 78 of 2003 in the Court of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Patti, district Taran Taran, for specific performance of contract entered into between him

Recent SC Judgement – Surjit Singh & Ors. Vs. Gurwant Kaur & Ors. – 27.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dilbahar Singh – 27.08.2014

[Civil Appeal No.6177 of 2004] [Civil Appeal No.2162 of 2004] [Civil Appeal No.2901 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.6954 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No.7520 of 2005] [Civil Appeal No.5212 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.2859 of 2006] [Civil Appeal No.3313 of 2007] [Civil Appeal No.1224 of 2006 SLP (C) No.34303 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No.7491 of 2004

Recent SC Judgement – Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dilbahar Singh – 27.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Manoj Narula Vs. Union of India – 27.08.2014

[Writ Petition (Civil) No. 289 of 2005] Dipak Misra, J. [for himself, R.M. Lodha, C.J., and S.A. Bobde, J.] A democratic polity, as understood in its quintessential purity, is conceptually abhorrent to corruption and, especially corruption at high places, and repulsive to the idea of criminalization of politics as it corrodes the legitimacy of the

Recent SC Judgement – Manoj Narula Vs. Union of India – 27.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Ghanshyam Sharma Vs. Surendra Kumar Sharma & Ors. – 26.08.2014

[Criminal Appeal No.1838 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.4540 of 2013] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 12th September, 2012 in Criminal Misc. Application No.34280 of 2011, the defacto complainant in case No.1743/IX/2009, arising out of Case Crime No.246 of 2009 on the file of the

Recent SC Judgement – Ghanshyam Sharma Vs. Surendra Kumar Sharma & Ors. – 26.08.2014 Read More »

Asking wife to have intercourse with other men amounts to cruelty: Bombay High Court

Justice Sadhana Jadhav of the Bombay High Court, while upholding the conviction of a man charged under Section 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code, held that forcing a woman to intercourse with other men and setting it as a condition for consummation of their marriage amounted to cruelty. The Court said, “P. W. 1 has

Asking wife to have intercourse with other men amounts to cruelty: Bombay High Court Read More »

Senior adv claims SC judge ruled for sister; SC bench responds stoically about ‘unbearable torture’ of judgeness

Senior advocate Vikas Singh alleged before a Supreme Court bench of justices SJ Mukhopadhaya and NV Ramana that an ex-Supreme Court judge made a ruling on 11 February, which helped the judge’s sister in a similar case under the Bombay Rent Act, in which she allegedly cited her brother’s judgment, reported Times of India. Singh claimed

Senior adv claims SC judge ruled for sister; SC bench responds stoically about ‘unbearable torture’ of judgeness Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.