MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Monday slammed doctors, saying the profession was no longer regarded a service and “all of us have suffered at the hands of doctors at one time or the other.” A bench of Justices V M Kanade and Anuja Prabhudessai made the observations on a public interest litigation converted from […]
All of us have suffered at hands of doctors: Bombay HC Read More »
NEW DELHI: Employees at Ordnance Factories (OF) – who have been contesting their omission from the benefits of the sixth pay commission for over seven years have finally more than one reason to rejoice. Reining in the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ at public offices, the Delhi High Court has directed the Centre
New pay scale benefits for ordnance staff too: HC Read More »
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday pulled up Haryana authorities after they failed to produce a self-styled godman, against whom a non-bailable warrant was issued last week in a contempt case, citing resistance by his followers. Though Sant Rampal did not appear, his aide Ram Kumar Dhaka was arrested and produced in the court
HC upset as authorities fail to produce self-styled godman Rampal Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1837 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 2331/2014] O R D E R R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 18.12.2013 passed in Criminal Revision No. 3982/2013 confirming the conviction of the appellant under Sections 420
Recent SC Judgement – Bishan Das Vs. State of Punjab and ANR. – 26.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 7128-7129 of 2011] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. These appeals have been filed assailing the common judgment and order dated 1.9.2009 passed by the Madras High Court in O.S.A. Nos.34 of 2009 and 140 of 2009 by which the High Court while allowing O.S.A. No.34 of 2009 filed by Respondent No.1, dismissed O.S.A.
[Civil Appeal No.8151 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.822 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No.8152 of 2014 @ S.L.P (C) No. 23088 of 2014 @ SLP (C) Cc No. 4627/2013] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. Delay condoned. 1. Leave granted. 2. The Division Bench of Orissa High Court, Cuttack by its impugned judgment dated 17th
[Criminal Appeal No. 1842 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.6673 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 1844 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.6384 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 1843 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.6674 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2.
Recent SC Judgement – Balwan & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana – 26.08.2014 Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a plea seeking to rename India as Bharat and asked the petitioner to approach an appropriate authority with its plea. The apex court bench headed by Chief Justice HL Dattu asked the petitioner to first make an appropriate representation before an authority in support of
SC declines to entertain plea for renaming India as Bharat Read More »
CHENNAI: With another round of power tariff hike around the corner, a PIL (public interest litigation) filed in the Madras high court has questioned the legality of the Tamil Nadu government’s policy move on technical grounds. The PIL, filed by senior advocate R Gandhi, wants the court to restrain the authorities from announcing and giving
PIL filed in Madras high court against Tamil Nadu’s move to hike power tariff Read More »
CHENNAI: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) activists were arrested in various parts of Tamil Nadu on Sunday as they attempted to take out route marches in their khakhi-white uniforms to mark the RSS foundation day and kick start celebrations to commemorate the 1000th coronation year of 11th century Tamil King Rajendra Chola. Despite the explicit orders
Despite Madras HC order, RSS rallies stopped, activists arrested Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
