Law Intellect India

admin

Recruit judges to tackle pendency: Govt to HC CJs

NEW DELHI: The Narendra Modi government is pushing judicial reforms with law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad writing letters to the chief justices of 24 high courts for the second time in four months, seeking their proactive approach in filling up vacancies. Expressing the government’s concern in a communication sent last week, Prasad said at present there are 22.5%

Recruit judges to tackle pendency: Govt to HC CJs Read More »

26/11 call record case: Mumbai police gets govt nod to move HC

In a relief to Mumbai Police Commissioner Rakesh Maria, the  Maharashtra government has allowed city police to move the Bombay High Court to challenge an order passed by the State Chief Information Commissioner, who initiated a judicial inquiry against him in connection with the alleged discrepancies in the 26/11 call records. “The government has given

26/11 call record case: Mumbai police gets govt nod to move HC Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – V. Sreeramachandra Avadhani (D) by LRS. Vs. Shaik Abdul Rahim & ANR. – 21.08.2014

[Civil Appeal No.2364 of 2005] Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Sheikh Hussein was married to Banu Bibi. During the subsistence of his matrimonial ties, Sheikh Hussein executed a gift deed on 26.04.1952, whereby a “tiled house” with open space in Survey No.883 in Eluru town, West Godavari District,

Recent SC Judgement – V. Sreeramachandra Avadhani (D) by LRS. Vs. Shaik Abdul Rahim & ANR. – 21.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Saraladevi & Ors. Vs. Divisional Manager, M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd & ANR. – 20.08.2014

Saraladevi & Ors. Vs. Divisional Manager, M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd & ANR. [Civil Appeal No.7158 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 4333 of 2014] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment dated 12.09.2012 passed in C.M.A. No. 690 of

Recent SC Judgement – Saraladevi & Ors. Vs. Divisional Manager, M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd & ANR. – 20.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Pemmada Prabhakar & Ors. Vs. Youngmen’s Vysya Association & Ors. – 20.08.2014

[Civil Appeal No. 7835 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 24653 of 2012] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and final order dated 04.11.2011 passed in the Second Appeal No. 815 of 2011 by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad,

Recent SC Judgement – Pemmada Prabhakar & Ors. Vs. Youngmen’s Vysya Association & Ors. – 20.08.2014 Read More »

Recent SC Judgement – Satvir Singh Vs. State of Delhi through Central Bureau of Investigation – 20.08.2014

[Criminal Appeal No. 920 of 2011] V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 07.01.2011 and order on sentence dated 08.03.2011 passed in Criminal Appeal No.337 of 1999 by the High Court of Delhi, whereby the High Court reversed the order of acquittal dated 11.03.1999 recorded by the

Recent SC Judgement – Satvir Singh Vs. State of Delhi through Central Bureau of Investigation – 20.08.2014 Read More »

Salman’s conviction could not be stayed merely because he can’t get a UK Visa: Supreme Court

A Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhyay and Justice A.K. Goel reserved its order on the appeal filed by the Rajasthan Government challenging a State High Court order staying the conviction of actor Salman Khan so that he could travel to Britain for a film engagement. The Bench asserted that Salman’s conviction could

Salman’s conviction could not be stayed merely because he can’t get a UK Visa: Supreme Court Read More »

Opinion: Madras HC anti-RTI judgment will ensure that opacity continues festering in our courts

Karnataka advocate @certiorary argues that a recent Madras high court judgment is the latest erosion of transparency in the judiciary, despite the RTI Act, and needs to be fixed at a higher level. Secrecy in public functioning is the antithesis of a democracy. The concept of secrecy in matters affecting the general public, classifies the

Opinion: Madras HC anti-RTI judgment will ensure that opacity continues festering in our courts Read More »

Disclaimer

In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.

The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.

Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.