NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday rescued the Centre from the prospect of carrying out a caste-based census — an exercise that could have led to a controversial reworking of quotas for other backward classes (OBCs). The HC had two years ago in a service matter ordered fresh caste-based census, more than 80 years […]
Supreme Court junks HC order on caste-based census Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 433-434 of 2006] O R D E R 1. These are statutory appeals filed under Section 130(E) of the Customs Act, 1962 from the judgment and order dated 23.8.2005, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai in Appeal No. C/791 & 792/03/Mum. 2. The
[Criminal Appeal No. 822 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 867 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 589 of 2014] [Criminal Appeal No. 1781 of 2014 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 3737 of 2014] S. A. BOBDE, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) No. 3737/2014. 2. These appeals are preferred by four accused against the
Recent SC Judgement – Raju @ Devendra Choubey Vs. State of Chhatisgarh – 21.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5198 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No. 7941 of 2014 @ S.L.P.(C) No. 26861 of 2008] [Civil Appeal No. 1113 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No. 7942 of 2014 @ S.L.P.(C) No. 2097 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No. 7943 of 2014 @ S.L.P.(C) No. 6355 of 2009] [Civil Appeal No. 5562 of 2009] [Civil
Recent SC Judgement – Singh Ram (D) through LRS. Vs. Sheo Ram & Ors. – 21.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.7936 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No. 12961 of 2011] Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 6.12.2010 of the High Court of Orissa in Writ Petition (C) No. 13033 of 2009, one of the respondents therein who is the purchaser of the property in an auction
Recent SC Judgement – Subhransu Sekhar Padhi Vs. Gunamani Swain & Others – 21.08.2014 Read More »
The Delhi High Court on 5.11.2014 dismissed W.P.(Crl.) No.2080/2014 as misconceived and imposed cost of Rs.1,000/- on the Petitioner payable to the Delhi Legal Services Authority within four weeks of the passing of the order. This Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India 1949, as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
All High Courts and subordinate judiciary has been asked been strictly directed by the apex Court to ascertain the authenticity of any complaint received against a judicial officer before taking any action on it. They have been asked to not entertain any complaint against a judicial officer unless it is accompanied by sworn affidavits and “verifiable
A Supreme Court bench comprising of Chief Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice A.K. Sikri has urged the States and Union Territories to take a decision regarding setting up of a mechanism for use of Information Technology in regulation of Right to Information Act. Disposing of a PIL filed by Madhya Pradesh-based lawyer Rajeev Agrawal in
A Delhi High Court bench comprising of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice R.S. Endlaw said that it will come to a decision on the Constitutional validity of several laws which allow direct appeal to the Supreme Court from their “apex adjudicatory” bodies. The petition challenged these laws as violating the power of the High
Advocate Deepak Khosla, who complained to Delhi high court chief justice (CJ) G Rohini yesterday against metropolitan magistrate Niti Phutela’s recusal and transfer of his case to another judge, has filed a criminal defamation case against Phutela in the Saket district court, asking for Rs 50 crore in damages. Khosla is representing former Delhi law minister Somnath
Khosla files Rs 50 cr criminal suit vs magistrate who allegedly defamed him in her order Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
