admin

[Criminal Appeal No.566 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 22.08.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in DB Criminal Jail Appeal No. 27 of 2003 acquitting the Respondent herein of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with […]

[Criminal Appeal Nos.2071-2072 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. These appeals by Special Leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 7.12.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur in Crl. Appeal Nos. 255 of 2001 and 306 of 2004. 2. Deceased Sadhana, daughter of PW 5 Narmadabai,

[Criminal Appeal No.2082 of 2008] Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. This appeal by special leave seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 11.02.2008 in DB-Criminal Appeal No.338 of 1983 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur acquitting the respondents of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 302 read with Section

[Criminal Appeal No. 486 of 2010] Dipak Misra, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7.09.2009 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 770-DB of 2006, whereby the Division Bench has confirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by

[Civil Appeal No.3581 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13697 of 2012] RANJAN GOGOI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 11th November, 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ- C No.62471 of 2011 by which the writ petition

[Arbitration Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2008] The petitioner is a former employee of Coca-Cola India, Inc., the respondent No.2 herein. At the time of joining the respondent company an agreement dated 20.09.1995 was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent No.2, relevant features of which will be noticed in due course. It appears that

[Civil Appeal No. 4494 of 2004] M/s. Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd., Chennai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil Nadu-I [Civil Appeal Nos. 4491-4493 of 2004] A. K. SIKRI, J. The appellant-assessee is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. Its main objective, as stated in the Memorandum of Association, is to acquire the

[Criminal Appeal No.457 of 2008] J.S.KHEHAR, J The appellant (Ravinder Kaur) and the respondent (Anil Kumar) got married on 14.08.1991. Soon thereafter, the respondent preferred a petition seeking divorce from the appellant before the Additional District Judge, Ropar. Having received summons in the above-mentioned case, the appellant entered appearance before the Additional District Judge, Ropar,