admin

[Criminal Appeal No. 688 of 2011] Ravinder Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2011] Shri Krishan Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [Criminal Appeal No. 785 of 2011] Manoj Misra, J. 1. These three appeals are against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi (in short “the […]

[Criminal Appeal No(s). 793-794 of 2022] [Criminal Appeal No. 795 of 2022] Sanjay Kumar, J 1. Ajit Pal @ Bobby, a 15-year-old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July, 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, and son, Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav, stood trial in Sessions Case

[Civil Appeal No. 6070 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 20183 of 2022] Sanjay Karol J., 1. Leave granted. 2. The following questions arise for consideration of this Court: 2.1 Whether in the absence of affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties on addressing the framed substantial questions of law, the High

[Writ Petition (Criminal) No(S). 520 of 2022] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner, currently serving a life imprisonment sentence for a crime committed in 1996, punishable under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter “IPC”) approaches this court seeking to enforce his right under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

[Criminal Appeal No. 2151 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (for short, ‘FEMA’) was brought into force with effect from 1st June 2000. By virtue of subsection (1) of Section 49 of FEMA, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (for short, ‘FERA’) stood repealed. On 11th February

[Civil Appeal No. 10861 of 2013] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. We had heard Shri Rakesh Dahiya learned counsel for the appellant, as well as Shri Raju Ramachandran, learned senior counsel for the respondents. Ms. (Dr.) Monika Gusain had appeared for the State of Haryana and was also heard. 2. The common judgment and order dated 18.05.2010 passed

[Criminal Appeal No. 2173 of 2011] Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. The original appellant P. Sarangapani son of Laxmaiah (accused no.1) having expired pending the present Appeal, his wife Paka Saroja was permitted to proceed further with the Appeal as per the order passed by the court on 31st August, 2023. 2. The instant Appeal is directed

[Civil Appeal No. 3351 of 2014 arising out of SLP(C) No. 17115/2010] Sanjay Karol, J. 1. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under: There was one Bahadur Pradhan who married Meena Pradhan (Defendant2/ Appellant No.1 herein) with whom he had two children namely, Ravi Kumar (Defendant3/ Appellant No.2 herein)

[Criminal Appeal No. 451 of 2019] 1. The Criminal Appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 17 February 2014 of the High Court of Jharkhand in Writ Petition (Criminal) No 128 of 2013. 2. An election was held on 30 March 2012 for two members of the Rajya Sabha representing the State of Jharkhand.

[Civil Appeal No. 14630 of 2015 @ SLP (C) No. 10013 of 2015] C.T. Ravikumar, J. 1. The captioned appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 17.10.2012 passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Second Appeal (MD) No. 802 of 2004 whereby and whereunder it reversed the concurrent judgments