A 72-year-old woman, who once worked for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), was found murdered in her East Delhi home Sunday, police said. The house, in Preet Vihar, had also been robbed. “Suman Bala Bhatnagar’s body was found by her tenants, who called police. A case of murder and robbery has been registered and […]
72-year-old woman found killed in Preet Vihar house Read More »
The CIC Prof M Sridhar Acharyulu held that during the pendency of RTI application relevant record should not be destroyed by public authority even if its weeding out policy permits. The CIC cautioned that such a destruction of record would be serious breach of Right to Information Act and directed to explain why penalty could
The Delhi high court on Thursday upheld a 2011 circular issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India that increased the period of limitation for invoking arbitration from six months to three years. According to the petitioner, the circulars issued by SEBI were detrimental to the interest of the investors and have been issued
Petitioner in the Black money case Senior Advocate Ram Jethmalani had suffered another setback after his Advocate-on Record Karanjanwala & Company decided to withdraw their Vakalath because of Mr.Jethmalani’s statement against Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, reports Times of India. It was on Mr.Jethmalani’s plea the Supreme Court had set-up a special
In a matrimonial Dispute pending before the Supreme Court the Petitioner wife had circulated a letter purportedly written by Justice V.R.Krishnaiyer to the then Chief Justice of India R.M.Lodha in the residence of Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Ramana, who were hearing the Case. The Bench deprecated the conduct of the Petitioner-wife and recused from
Putting up a brave front, AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa on Sunday assured party workers that she will come out of the present case as she had successfully faced many challenges, saying her “public life amounted to swimming in a sea of inferno.” In her first statement after walking out of the Parappana Agrahara Central Prison at
I am not going to be cowed down or lose heart: AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa Read More »
[Transfer Petition (CRL.) No.197 / 2012] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. In this petition under Section 406 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek transfer of Criminal Complaint No.3960 of 2008 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court at New Delhi to the Court competent to try
[Transfer Petition (CRL.) No.403 of 2013] T.S. THAKUR, J. 1. In this petition under Section 406 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners seek transfer of Criminal Complaint No.14089 of 2009 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gurgaon, Haryana to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Bangalore. 2. The petitioner appears to have borrowed a
[Civil Appeal Nos.7227-7257 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.5161-5191 of 2001] [Civil Appeal Nos.7258-7311 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.15196-15249 of 2002] C. NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted. All these appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 11.9.2000 in LPA No.210 of 1999 and connected appeals passed by the Division Bench
Recent SC Judgement – Mohinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana – 04.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 7174 Of 2014 arising out of SLP(C) No.9914 of 2012] [C.A. No.7175 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) No.10363/2012] [C.A. Nos.7195-7201 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) Nos.18158-18164/2012] [C.A. No.7177 of 2014 (@ SLP(C) No.18420/2012] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. In these appeals the appellants have challenged the common judgment and order dated
Recent SC Judgement – Babu Lal & Ors. Vs. M/s. Vijay Solvex Ltd. & Ors. – 04.08.2014 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
