NEW DELHI: The CBI’s failure to trace a 26-year-old woman, who disappeared from a police station two years ago, has earned the ire of the Delhi High Court. The court castigated the premier investigating agency for dragging its feet as some police officials are “strong suspects” in the case. “The woman went missing after she […]
Missing woman: HC ticks off CBI for slow probe Read More »
The Centre told the Supreme Court on Friday in strong words that an income tax report has disclosed “astonishing state of affairs” between former CBI director A P Singh and meat exporter Moin Qureshi and that Singh’s conduct was “wholly unbecoming of the office he held”. The report has, however, given a clean chit to
The Delhi government is all set to ensure that Chinese crackers, which flooded the market during Diwali last year, will not be sold in the city this time. It has also banned the use of fire crackers between 10 pm and 6 am. Those who continue bursting crackers till late might land in soup. “Strict
Crackers banned after 10 pm on Diwali Read More »
The special public prosecutor in the 2G case has told the Supreme Court that it was “definitely improper” for CBI director Ranjit Sinha to frequently meet those accused in the coal and 2G scam cases and these meetings could not be a matter of Sinha’s right to privacy. The prosecutor also stressed that the alleged
CBI chief’s meetings with 2G accused improper: Special public prosecutor Read More »
NEW DELHI: Along with his wife and three-year-old daughter, Sankalp Anand drove from Delhi to Mathura in Uttar Pradesh and the family then jumped in front of a train. Santosh, 38, and his wife were killed. Their child Riddhima survived and is with her grandparents in Delhi after being treated for serious injuries. The police
Leaving an 11-page Note, They Jumped Before a Train. Their Daughter, 3, Survived Read More »
The NDA government on Friday urged the Supreme Court to modify its order in the black money case on absolute disclosure of information pertaining to people who stashed tainted money abroad. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi mentioned the fresh application before a bench led by Chief Justice H L Dattu, which put it for hearing on
Black money case: Centre seeks modification of court orders on disclosure of info Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos. 7167-7168 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 38898-38899 of 2013] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Present appeals raise an interesting question of law pertaining to the form and content of show cause notice, that is required to be served, before deciding as to whether the noticee
[Civil Appeal Nos.7164-7166 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 23016-23018 of 2012] A.K. SIKRI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. By the common judgment dated 29.02.2012, the Madras High Court has decided three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the
[Civil Appeal No.7191 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.9942 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. Being aggrieved by an interim order passed in a civil suit, the appellants- original defendants have approached this Court by way of this appeal. The matter has arisen under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act,
Recent SC Judgement – Precious Jewels & ANR. Vs. Varun Gems – 04.08.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 5509 of 2012] SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J. 1. The only issue falling for consideration in this Appeal filed under Section 116A read with Section 116B of the Representation of People Act, 1951 is whether for the purpose of Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, the first respondent held an office of
Recent SC Judgement – U.C. Raman Vs. P.T.A. Rahim and Ors. – 01.08.2014 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
