[Criminal Appeal No. 152 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 153 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 154 of 2012] [Criminal Appeal No. 155 of 2012] JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. The appellants, while being engaged in the business of stocking iron ore, had allegedly violated certain norms prescribed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 22 of the […]
Recent SC Judgement – P. Pramila Vs. State of Karnataka – 09.04.15 Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8850 of 2015] Bajrang Bahadur Singh Vs. His Excellency, the Governor of U.P. & Others [Transferred Case No.60 of 2015] Chelameswar, J. 1. One Bajrang Bahadur Singh respondent no. 1 in SLP(C) No. 8850/2015 and the petitioner in Transferred Case No. 60/2015 (hereinafter being referred to as the petitioner for the
Recent SC Judgement – Election Commission of India Vs. Bajrang Bahadur Singh – 09.04.15 Read More »
The Supreme Court has rejected the Mizoram government’s special leave petition against a lower court’s order that the Anti-Corruption Bureau investigate alleged misappropriation of funds in the construction of two mini hydel projects in south Mizoram. The SC’s dismissal of the government’s plea paves the way for the anti-graft agency to finally begin a probe
SC rejects Mizoram government plea, paves way for criminal probe against top engineers Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.594 of 2015 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No. 108 of 2015] O R D E R V.GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 14.07.2014 passed in Criminal Petition No. 2859 of 2012 by the High Court of Judicature of Karnataka at Bangalore, wherein the High
Recent SC Judgement – Yunus Zia Vs. State of Karnataka – 09.04.15 Read More »
[Contempt Petition (C) No. 421 of 2014 in Civil Appeal No. 4831 of 2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.428/2014 in C.A. No.4815/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.431/2014 in C.A. No.4823/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.427/2014 in C.A. No.4836/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.424/2014 in C.A. No.4824/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.432/2014 in C.A. No.4828/2014] [Contempt Petition (C) No.423/2014 in C.A.
[Review Petition (CRL.) No.474 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.1728 of 2007] We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, at length. We have gone through the judgment sought to be reviewed and we have considered the arguments advanced on both sides.
[Civil Appeal No. 2957 of 2007] AMITAVA ROY,J. The oft encountered debate on the extent of tax liability based on the classification of the determinants of a levy in law seeks judicial scrutiny in the attendant factual conspectus. The appellant being aggrieved by the determination made by the High Court of Gujarat on the issue
Recent SC Judgement – Voltas Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat – 08.04.15 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No.3391 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19487 of 2014] M. Y. EQBAL, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.04.2014 of the Gauhati High Court whereby the revision petition filed by the respondents was allowed and the eviction suit filed
Recent SC Judgement – Dr. Ambica Prasad Vs. Md. Alam – 08.04.15 Read More »
Warangal Police today uncovered a seven-member interstate burglary gang after arresting its kingpin, who was about to flee the state with loot worth Rs 24 lakhs. Accused Erdhar Pawar was arrested by detectives of Warangal Crime Branch when he was about to board a train to Bhopal from the local railway station, said Malla Reddy,
Telangana: Interstate burglar gang busted, gold worth Rs 24 lakh recovered Read More »
KARACHI: The Lahore high court has given a clean chit to Pakistan’s maverick former fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar, who was fined seven million rupees and banned for five years by the PCB in 2008 for violating the players code of conduct. According to its detailed judgement the Lahore high court set aside the punishment and
Shoaib Akhtar gets clean chit from Lahore high court Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
