admin

[Civil Appeal No. 6027 of 2014] K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. Samir Kumar Majumder (the appellant) was a school teacher at the Railway Higher Secondary School, Alipurduar Junction. He taught mathematics to the school children. Aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court at Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as ‘the High Court’) dated 19.07.2011 in W.P.C.T. […]

[Civil Appeal No._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 27301 of 2018] Hima Kohli, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. A challenge has been laid in the present appeal to the judgement dated 24th January, 2018, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior, dismissing the appeal1 filed

[Civil Appeal No. 5968 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 18100 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 5969 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 18574 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No. 5970 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 19227 of 2023] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI 1. Leave granted. 2. These

[Civil Appeal No. 836 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No. 3369 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No(S). 2256 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). _______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) Diary No(S). 4647 of 2018] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 11204 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023

[Civil Appeal No(S). 10069 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S). 5005-5007 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 2737 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 5400 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No(S). 26756 of 2016] [Civil Appeal No(S). 3881-3882 of 2019] Nagarathna,

[Civil Appeal No. 2768 of 2023] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The appellant, who is the original plaintiff has preferred this appeal for challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd June 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench). By the impugned judgment, the

[Civil Appeal No. 2552/2022] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment of NCLAT dated 01.12.2021 on a limited aspect. It is not necessary for us to delve into all the factual scenario which gave rise to these proceedings. Suffice to say that there is no controversy before us

[Civil Appeal Nos. 1538-1539 of 2008] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 358 of 2011] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI 1. The appeals1 arise from a judgment and order dated 15 October 2003 of a Division Bench at the Jaipur Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan. In addition, there is a writ petition2 under

[Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018] [SLP(C) No. 10918/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9604/2018] [SLP(C) No. 9613/2018] [Diary No(s). 24834/2018] [Diary No(s). 25256/2018] [SLP(C) No. 24671/2018] [Diary No(s). 32753/2018] [Diary No(s). 32756/2018] [Diary No(s). 37055/2018] [Diary No(s). 39059/2018] [SLP(C) No. 426/2019] [SLP(C) No. 505-506/2019] [SLP(C) No. 17506/2018] [Diary No(s). 23638/2018] [Diary No(s). 24137/2018] [Diary No(s). 24530/2018] [Diary

[Criminal Appeal No. 1255 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 1999] [Criminal Appeal No. 1367 of 1999] [Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 47 of 2011] [Writ Petition (C) No. 316 of 2008] [TC (C) No. 27 of 2011] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 316 of 2008] 1. This batch of cases raises two significant issues: (i)