Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL challenging the change of guard in Tamil Nadu with the swearing in of Panneerselvam as Chief Minister after AIADMK supremo Jayalalithaa was convicted in an illegal assets case. A bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M. Sathyanarayanan dismissed the PIL filed by an advocate, […]
Madras HC dismisses PIL against Jayalalithaa’s removal as CM Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.1381 of 2014 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.4018 of 2012] V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants questioning the correctness of the judgment and final order dated 11.08.2010 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 1256 of 2005 in setting aside
Recent SC Judgement – C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka – 15.07.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 6396 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.31619 of 2012] C. NAGAPPAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and final order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in L.A.A. no.995 of 2010. 3. The property of the appellants
[Criminal Appeal No.1331 of 2014 arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 1565 of 2013] Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. The two issues that pronouncedly emanate in this appeal by special leave are whether the Family Court while deciding an application under Section 7 of the Family Court Act, 1984 (for brevity, “the Act”) which includes
Recent SC Judgement – Bhuwan Mohan Singh Vs. Meena & Ors. – 15.07.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 127 of 2007] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18th July, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No. 109 of 2006. By the impugned judgment, the High Court affirmed the concurrent finding of the lower courts
The Supreme Court Wednesday refused to vacate or suspend an order banning animal sacrifice during Kulu Dushara and in other religious rituals of the Kulu region of Himachal Pradesh. The apex court bench of Chief Justice HL Dattu, Justice SA Bobde and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre declined to order an interim suspension of the Himachal
SC refuses to lift HC ban on religious animal sacrifice Read More »
An executive order called the Delhi Private Placement Agencies (Regulation) Order, 2014 has been released in compliance with the order passed by the High Court of Delhi in December, 2010 and December, 2013 in the case of Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and others. In the case, the Court had directed the Govt.
Guidelines and protocols for medico legal care for survivors/victims of sexual violence have been released by the Ministry of Health and family Welfare. The guidelines have specifically been drawn up for rape cases, although the same could be used for other cases as well. They are aimed at doctors who might be indulged in handling
The Practice of letter circulation has been reinstated by the Supreme Court with immediate effect. Earlier former CJI R M Lodha had taken tough stand on adjournments and stopped the practice. It was the practice in the Supreme Court whereby the lawyers usually circulate a letter for adjournment and then inform the court, when the
Supreme Court reinstates Practice of Circulation of letters for adjournment Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 6284 of 2014 @Special Leave Petition (Civil.) No. 18367 of 2012] CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J. The complainant-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated May 27, 2011 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the National Commission’), setting aside the Order dated July 14, 2006 of the Punjab State
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
