[Civil Appeal No.1103 of 2004] Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the judgment and order dated July 22, 2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appeal No.1806 of 1992. The High Court after perusing the facts and the evidence on record by the said judgment […]
Recent SC Judgement – Easwari Vs. Parvathi & Ors – 10.07.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1615 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Bihar and others against the judgment dated 7th May, 2007 passed by the High Court Judicature at Patna in Cr.W.J.C. No.352 of 2002. By the impugned judgment the High Court giving reference to the provisions
Recent SC Judgement – State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh & Ors. – 09.07.2014 Read More »
[Special Leave Petition (C) No.11684 of 2012] [Special Leave Petition No…..Cc No. 14663 of 2010] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21554 of 2013] [Special Leave Petition No…..Cc No. 20144 of 2010] [Special Leave Petition No…..Cc No. 9303 of 2011] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 30751 of 2012] [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15307 of 2013]
Recent SC Judgement – State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) – 08.07.2014 Read More »
In a joint operation, Vijayawada Police and the Delhi Police Crime Branch arrested four contract killers — residents of Delhi’s Kalyanpuri and Trilokpuri—and three others for their involvement in the killing of three members of a family on the outskirts of Vijayawada on September 24. The incident had sent shockwaves through Andhra Pradesh as the
Seven held in city for murder of three on Andhra highway Read More »
The Election Commission (EC), which had sought to ascertain whether the clearance given by the state government to a land deal between Robert Vadra and real estate firm DLF violates the model code of conduct, received a report from the Haryana poll authorities on Tuesday. EC sources said the report was received from the Chief
Vadra-DLF case: Haryana nod to Vadra land deal under EC scanner Read More »
Widespread attacks and protests erupted across Tamil Nadu on Tuesday soon after the Karnataka High Court rejected former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa’s bail plea. The protesters targeted vehicles with Karnataka registration numbers and business establishments owned by people from the neighbouring state. At the party headquarters here, a dozen AIADMK ministers and senior leaders gathered
After Jaya setback, violence in TN, protesters target Karnataka vehicles Read More »
After Agra’s Taj Mahal, world heritage properties in Fatehpur Sikri have drawn the attention of the Supreme Court, which has come to the rescue of the monuments sitting in shambles despite periodic bouts of release of concerns and funds. From a new traffic movement plan to the construction of boundary walls around the monuments; from
Supreme Court comes to the rescue of heritage properties in Fatehpur Sikri Read More »
The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday rejected the bail plea of AIADMK chief J Jayalalithaa in connection with the disproportionate assets case. Rejecting her bail plea, the High Court observed that the Supreme Court had stated that corruption is the violation of human rights. This came after arguments were made on behalf of the former
Jayalalithaa to stay in jail as Karnataka High Court rejects her bail in DA case Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1986 of 2009] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th August, 2005 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal(now Uttarakhand) at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.1388 of 2001 (Old No.-Criminal Appeal No.1165 of 1988). By the impugned judgment the High Court upheld the judgment and
Recent SC Judgement – Khim Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand – 08.07.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No.719 of 2010] Chandrakanta Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No.720 of 2010] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 18th August, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Criminal Appeal No.388 of 2005. By the impugned judgment
Recent SC Judgement – State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajendra & Ors. – 08.07.2014 Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
