admin

[Criminal Appeal No.1251 of 2006] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16th June, 2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No.9/2000. By the impugned judgment the High Court partly allowed the appeal preferred by the State of Karnataka, set aside the judgment of acquittal

[Civil Appeal No. 5927 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.7704 of 2008] VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This Appeal assails the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta which had allowed the Appeal preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, who in turn had applied and

[Civil Appeal No.4712 of 2007] ANIL R. DAVE, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26th June, 2007, delivered in A.P.D. No.614 of 2005 by the High Court of Calcutta, this appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings arrived at by the High Court in the aforestated appeal. 2. Facts which

[Criminal Appeal No. 1300 of 2014 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) No. 2447 of 2013] N.V. RAMANA. J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of order dated 6th November, 2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad refusing the prayer of the appellant for quashing the proceedings in Complaint Case

[Civil Appeal No.4995 of 2014 arising out of SLP (C) No.36661 of 2013] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgement dated 18th November, 2013 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Writ Petition No.622 of 2013. By the impugned judgment, the High Court quashed the order dated

[Criminal Appeal No. 1708 of 2009] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th October, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Revision Application No.321 of 2004. By the impugned judgment, the High Court set aside the judgment dated 29th May, 2004

[Criminal Appeal No.684 of 2011] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J 1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 471-SB of 1999 whereby the High Court confirmed the judgment and order dated 23rd April, 1999 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge,

[Criminal Appeal No. 292 of 2011] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 3rd February, 2010, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRA No.909-SB of 1997. By the impugned common judgment the High Court dismissed the revision application preferred by the appellant and