LUCKNOW: The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Thursday issued notice to Samajwadi Party’s Azam Khan to explain why he shouldn’t be disqualified as a UP cabinet minister for simultaneously availing of facilities as the chancellor of Mohammad Ali Jauhar University in Rampur. The bench gave him six weeks to file his response, […]
Explain dual posts in 6 weeks: HC to Azam Read More »
NEW DELHI: While the Enforcement Directorate made its first arrest — businessman and lawyer Gautam Khaitan — in the Rs 3600 crore AgustaWestland chopper scam, CBI is still dragging its feet in the case. Even after 20 months of investigation, CBI is nowhere close to filing the chargesheet despite finishing the probe at India’s end
CBI dragging feet in chopper scam, no chargesheet even after 20 months of probe Read More »
WASHINGTON: A day before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s landmark visit to the US, a human rights group has obtained summons against him for his alleged role in the 2002 Gujarat riots as state chief minister. New York based American Justice Centre (AJC) obtained the summons from the US Federal Court for the Southern District of
US court issues summons against Narendra Modi Read More »
The Centre has left it to the Supreme Court (SC) to decide on whether rummy, poker and other card games, played online or in clubs for stakes, amount to gambling. These games would come under the ambit of gambling and thus illegal only if it is held that they involve sheer luck and no skill.
Centre: Let SC decide if rummy, poker are gambling Read More »
[Civil Appeal No. 8605 of 2013] Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15th April, 1998 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Civil First Appeal No.1 of 1995. By the impugned judgment and decree the High Court allowed the appeal,
[Writ Petition (Criminal) No.229 of 2004] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J 1. The petitioner, who was convicted for the offence u/s 302/34 IPC, has preferred this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in the nature of habeas corpus for setting the petitioner at liberty from the illegal custody in the prison/correctional Home.
Recent SC Judgement – Arjun Jadav Vs. State of West Bengal– 02.07.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 165 of 2004] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 166-167 of 2004] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J. 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 9th December, 2002 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.326/99 c/w Criminal Appeal No. 310/99. By the impugned judgment High Court reversed the judgment of
Recent SC Judgement – Seena @ Srinivasa Vs. State of Karnataka– 02.07.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 1424 of 2012] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24th September, 2010 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 495 of 2005 maintaining their conviction and sentence under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC, the appellants have filed
Recent SC Judgement – Umakant Vs. State of Chhatisgarh– 01.07.2014 Read More »
From now on, giving missed calls to women could land you up in jail in Bihar. A circular issued by CID Inspector General (Weaker Section) Arvind Pandey to all district Superintendents of Police (SPs) and Government Rail Police (GRP) SPs has directed them to ensure that police investigate and take action in such cases with
In Bihar, you may go to jail for missed calls to women Read More »
Characterising its verdict as futuristic, corrective as well as compensatory, the Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed allocations of 214 out of 218 coal blocks that it had declared as illegal last month. A bench led by Chief Justice of India R M Lodha spared four blocks, two of which were allocations made to the Ultra
Supreme Court scraps 214 coal blocks, leaves 1 lakh crore, 30000 MW-question Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
