A day after Sudipta Sen’s driver told the CBI of being witness to meetings between the Saradha Group chairman and TMC leaders before the former escaped to Kashmir, TMC MP Suvendu Adhikari on Wednesday appeared before the investigating agency to “become a witness” in the multi-crore chit fund scam. Adhikari, who was summoned by the […]
Saradha Scam: TMC MP Adhikari says ‘his decision to become CBI witness’ Read More »
NEW DELHI: The tragic incident at the Delhi zoo could have been avoided had the guards posted there been more vigilant. It also exposed the fact that the security staff were not properly trained to manage a large crowd, spot potential mischief makers, impose discipline on visitors and teach them how to respect animals and
Delhi zoo guards not trained to handle crises Read More »
[Criminal Appeal No. 375 of 2010] N.V. RAMANA, J. 1. The appellants, who were convicted under Sections 302/149 and 148, IPC by the Trial Court and whose conviction was altered by the High Court to Section 302/34, IPC, have filed this appeal by way of special leave, having been dissatisfied with the judgment and order
Recent SC Judgement – Ram Kumar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh– 01.07.2014 Read More »
[Criminal Appeal Nos.1535-1538 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Lichman & ANR [Criminal Appeal No.1539 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Vazir & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No.1540 of 2004] State of Rajasthan Vs. Hoshiyar Singh & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 1541 of 2004] (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. 1. These appeals arise out of a
Recent SC Judgement – Balbir Vs. Vazir– 01.07.2014 Read More »
[Civil Appeal Nos.5899-5900 of 2014 arising out of SLP (c) Nos.16958-59 of 2013] ANIL R. DAVE, J. Leave granted. As facts of both the appeals are similar, at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, both the appeals had been heard together. Being aggrieved by the judgments delivered by the High Court
[Civil Appeal Nos. of 2014 @ out of SLP (C) Nos.36299-36303/2010] SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 16th July, 2005 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand) at Nainital in first Appeal No. 56 of 2001 (Old No.325/1995). By the impugned
Recent SC Judgement – Jai Krishan (D) through LRS. Vs. State of Uttarakhand – 01.07.2014 Read More »
BHOPAL: A man beat his 13-year-old daughter to death in Shahdol district on Monday evening after being prodded by his neighbours who provoked him making allegations about her character. After investigations police arrested accused on Tuesday. Incident took place at Hathidol village of the district. Police said accused Ramdhani Rathore, 40, returned home from work
Man beats daughter to death in Madhya Pradesh’s Shahdol district Read More »
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday formed a 5-member committee headed by senior registrar of J&K high court to evaluate the ground situation in the state in the aftermath of the floods. The apex court has directed the committee to file report within two weeks before it and also before J&K high court. The
J&K floods: SC forms panel to evaluate ground situation Read More »
GUWAHATI: At least 55 people have been killed and hundreds of thousands displaced in flash floods and mudslides in the northeast after days of heavy rain, local authorities said Wednesday. The chief minister of Meghalaya, where 35 people have died, said the floods were the worst in recent memory, and bad weather was hampering the
Floods kill at least 55 in Assam, Meghalaya Read More »
CHENNAI: Madras high court has ordered a CBI probe into the alleged custodial torture and rape of a woman, who was picked up by Udumalpet police on August 11 in connection with a murder case. Justice V Ramasubramanian, passing orders on a writ petition filed by Girija (name changed), daughter of the torture victim, also
Madras high court orders CBI probe into custodial rape case Read More »
In accordance with the Bar Council of India rules, Law Intellect India does not solicit work or advertise through this website. By clicking ‘I agree,’ you acknowledge that you are accessing this information voluntarily and that no attorney-client relationship is created through this site.
The content on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. We disclaim any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. For personalized legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Please review and accept our Privacy Policy before using this website. All intellectual property rights related to the website and its content belong to the Firm.
